At the test track, that automatic combines with the A8's all-wheel drive and 19-inch Pirelli P6 tires to produce the world's most boring launches, but the car is quick. We measured 0-to-60-mph performance at 5.8 seconds, and the quarter-mile at 13.8 seconds at 102 mph. Remarkable performance for a 4,700-pound car.
0 to 60 in 5.8 LOL!
A stock '06 Mustang GT are faster: 0-60 in 5.0 with 1/4 mile 13.7 sec @ 103 mph.
Now that said and done mine is modified with AFE stage 2 CAI, SCT Brenspeed tune, cat backs Hurst short throw and 3:73 gears and sub 5 times to 60!
Know your facts before you post Audi boy!
quote:
ORIGINAL: pilihp2
ovrpar, you sir are seriously retarded. an a8 w-12 is huge, and big, and heavy. but will so easily rape your GT. and will rape it with 3 passengers and a trunk full of luggage. and even a baby seat in the rear middle seat. get off the crack before you make another post.
#s on paper don't mean jack! Honestly!!!!! So many facotrs to consider... and at the end of the day, A mustang is still the same POS whether a 5 or 4 or 6 second car! owned one and never gong back! I killed a GT on the Hwy wht my car and the guys wasn't so proud! I do think a GT would kill a stock 2.7 though...
ROFL. You had to mod your Mustang to be able to even compare though man. If I bought a mustang, I would HAVE to mod it to not feel liek a tool driving it.
Audi's come just how I want em, and if I feel so inclined, I can make it even sexier and more badass than it already is.
why are you on this forum? do you even own an audi ovrpar .... if the answer is no take yourself and the piece of trash you wasted your money on and go talk about it with people who actually care ... also if your in the PA area ill give you a run for your money
_____________________________
-Joe
2002 a6 2.7t / GIAC / REMUS / AWE-Tuning s-flo intake / bailey's DVs / vast stage 3 tip chip /vast piggies / obx manifolds / k04's and rs4 ecu platform to come soon!
You know what I think I'm just going to buy a Honda Civic there better than Audi's and with a fart cannon will rape an A8 W12, not to mention those slow s4's and 2.7ters. But I don't think I'll have enough power to beat that Mustang V6 though!
_____________________________
Life is hard. After all, it kills you. 2002 A6 3.0 Mods: Loved and tinted and debadged = +47 hp at the wheels
I have to admit the new Mustang is leaps and bounds better compared to the previous one! COngrats to Ford but it still lacks a lot... Still a cheap sport cars.. but you do get a lot for the $... I would rather spend the same $ on a different car but it is a matter of taste...
someone driving the a8 w12 will most likely not race your car... it is a fast car made for cruising and you would be pathetic if you are going to try to race one, the owner of the a8 will most likely have a sports car too that would just rape your car if he wanted to race you. plus mustangs, give me a break, people will always look at an audi over the mustang.... and you had to mod your mustang to even try racing one, the w12 would rape it stock.
the a8 w12 is much better than a mustang and it is a winner over your car anyday, they aren't even on the same scale, price ranges aren't even close... just being the fastest is everything, that car is still much much better and superior than the mustang... judging from the posts, no one cares about ford mustangs... it's more about audis ("audi" forums)
and the engines, dont even compare the w12 to your pathetic v8 made by ford
not to be rude or anything... i just dont like mustangs but w/e, it's your car and you have to like it... ^^^that's just my opinion
but seriously, do you even own an audi? go to some other forum and preach about your mustang over there were at least there would be some people who would actually care...
< Message edited by jeaudi -- 3/26/2008 11:34:53 PM >
To his defense a 99-04 stang will crush our audi's stock for stock, its just plain and simple. I dont know if any of you who posted have actually been in one, they pull pretty hard. They arnt supposed to be luxury cars like ours, they are meant to drive fast for a little amount of money. I've always been a fan of the stang, and support them. Like gigi stated about tho, if you've got a stage 2+ audi 2.7 you can do work on them :)
_____________________________
APR 93 octane, Hyperboost DV's, gutted pre cats...
To his defense a 99-04 stang will crush our audi's stock for stock, its just plain and simple. I dont know if any of you who posted have actually been in one, they pull pretty hard. They arnt supposed to be luxury cars like ours, they are meant to drive fast for a little amount of money. I've always been a fan of the stang, and support them. Like gigi stated about tho, if you've got a stage 2+ audi 2.7 you can do work on them :)
Depends what mustang and what audi, that was a very vague stagement.
_____________________________
Life is hard. After all, it kills you. 2002 A6 3.0 Mods: Loved and tinted and debadged = +47 hp at the wheels
Since I have to explain, there is no more implication.... basically this d-bag thinks that his mustang is awesome at everything and God chose it to be his chariot.
Meanwhile back in reality his car is a a cookie cutter car, that SAME car that I avoided like the plague when shopping for a new vehicle 4 months ago.
One man's (Me) trash (mustang) is another man's (ovrpar) treasure.
To his defense a 99-04 stang will crush our audi's stock for stock, its just plain and simple. I dont know if any of you who posted have actually been in one, they pull pretty hard. They arnt supposed to be luxury cars like ours, they are meant to drive fast for a little amount of money. I've always been a fan of the stang, and support them. Like gigi stated about tho, if you've got a stage 2+ audi 2.7 you can do work on them :)
Depends what mustang and what audi, that was a very vague stagement.
I was talking about the mustang GT (4.6 V8) and the audi 2.7T. Reason i brought this up is because there is a ton of bashing on the Mustang. Im personally a fan, and while others are just being biased because they own an audi, i respect the power of the stang. If i had the extra cash to pick up a drag/highway lurker, id pick up a mustang because with very little money you can acheive a ton of power.
Well this is an audi forum, so i must say mustangs, gt or not, are pieces of crap. Ive killed one by about 1.5 carlengths on a 40-100 pull. I dont know about mustangs acheiving a ton of power, besides, id rather have half the power in german ponies than american pos's.
well i did say that is just my opinion... but he should have known he would have it coming when he posted something like that here where everybody is an audi fanatic. numbers to prove him or not, i still dont care if it faster.... i i'd even take the A8 itself over the mustang rather yet the w12, the A8s are beautiful.
and yes, i have several friends who own mustangs from the 90s to even the newest ones and i could still care less. have you ever noticed how cheap and low quality they look especially inside?
Mustangs sucks @$$! LOL that's just a biased opinion considering every mustang I've seen that isn't stock is driven by an a-hole that has a small penis syndrome.
Posts: 568
Joined: 1/29/2008 From: St. Louis, MO Status: online
Well, besides that fact that most of us agree that this is a completly worthless waste of server space... The mustang is complete crap. I'm just glad that the newer mustangs finally got rid of leaf springs. Seriously a v6 mustang is -200hp stock, even the mighty GT only manages 255hp stock with a V8. I really don't get how american car companies can get so little power out of a engine.
_____________________________
2000 A6 2.7t Tiptronic APR Chip, 710n DV's, K&N drop-in, 00022 tip re-code. Planned: S6 Door Blades, Rs6 trunk lip, Custom Exhaust... Or Trade for S4!
ahahaha seriously... they can't extract much hp from each L, american cars around 5.0L most of the time produce 220-260hp max. which is funny... take a look at what Europeans can do with the 5.0L range, double the amount of hp
seriously though how do they do it? lol, maybe the oil industry has a thing to do with it, such big engines>low power>low mpg.
Only producing 220-260? Hopefully, you're kidding. I had an '05 GTO that was 400 HP at 6.0L got better gas mileage highway than my '01 2.7. 1 more thing...please don't get me wrong, I hate Mustakes, but the '03-'04 Cobra's with a catback, pully, and intake run 11's all day long. Z06's do that stock now. The new G8's have 362HP. THE V6's have 300HP. Obviously, different cars and different car companies do things differently. That's what makes cars so much fun!
i was being sarcastic (i thought you'd figure) i dont like mustangs... but i do respect the new Shelby GT500 and the 1967 one (can't argue with that) and i like vettes and GTOs are nice... but that is where the list stops.
i was kidding, you took me too serious... i was talking about the crown vics, town cars, and the suvs hahahaha you have to make fun of them
_____________________________
--------JE--------- -C5 Audi A6 Quattro -W210 M.B. E-Class
i beat a crustang with my supercharged 4runner... obviously stock v8 auto... i also beat my own old p00nstang with a light pole once. anything to get another one off the road though
_____________________________
01:4Runner:Supercharged:Sport Package 96:A6qAvant:Mud Demon 08:SchickTitatniumQuattro:Closest Shave I Ever Gave
Printable Version
RE: 2.7T vs Mustang - 
