B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

letting your car idle to warm up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 12:19 AM
  #11  
Msnickbroderick's Avatar
Actual WIZARD
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,047
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

I find the restarting after 10 seconds at a light thing odd. I was always told starting the car does the most wear on components...
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:00 AM
  #12  
zerokiller698's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 135
From: Independence, Ky
Default

and thats very true. starting the car wears on it because the pumps are not pushing oil. the people that write those articles have no tech back ground, they drive a prius, and believe in Scientology, and smell their own.....

sorry for the rant
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:13 AM
  #13  
NHolzschuh's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 524
From: st paul, mn
Default

hahahah zero^
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:23 AM
  #14  
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,150
From: Jersey Shore
Default

I like how every one of those claims was supported by a study from a company or organization that was anti emissions and pro environment. Biased much?
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:25 AM
  #15  
shoot2thrill's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16
Default

I started my a4 up the other day and was flooring it on the freeway about 45 seconds later. The check engine light is now on.
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:31 AM
  #16  
NHolzschuh's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 524
From: st paul, mn
Default

im gonna go out on a whim here but....
ideally if your car is NOT warmed up you drive at higher RPMs thus burning more fuel and make a thicker exhaust or w/e releasing more chemicals into the atmosphere...
when your car is idle the engine works much less and emits a lot less harmful chemicals correct?

so ideally wouldn't either way really just be about the same?
now i understand a car idling for a half hour, would burn much more fuel then taking off at a higher RPM for a few minutes.

so, wouldn't the only plausible out come be, POSSIBLY, more wear on your car and really little to no difference in the chemicals you're releasing..?
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:45 AM
  #17  
Tourbo24's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,178
From: Peoria AZ
Default

i usually let the rpms drop down, takes like 2 mins
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 09:13 AM
  #18  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

In the winter I always let mine idle to warm up before I go someplace, mostly because i'm a big baby and hate being cold lol. I also got in the habit of letting it idle to cool off when i get wherever i'm going. Not sure if either is necessary but it can't hurt, right?
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #19  
McGovs2.7TB5's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,950
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Tourbo24
i usually let the rpms drop down, takes like 2 mins
Yep, I usually let the SAI do its thing then head off, I don't get into boost until the oil temp is at least to the 1st notch though. Idling more than a couple minutes is just wasting gas.

btw madmitch, are you in CO? It was 7* here this morning too.
 

Last edited by McGovs2.7TB5; Jan 10, 2011 at 03:07 PM.
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #20  
NHolzschuh's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 524
From: st paul, mn
Default

cca4, i also let my car "cool off" after a drive, its suppose to rest a little before turning off your car when you have a turbo. i let it idle for 30secs - 1 minute, hence a turbo timer.

i don't have one so i just sit there and turn down my radio, turn off the heated seats etc. anything to waste a minute before killing the engine.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.