AudiForums.com

AudiForums.com (https://www.audiforums.com/forum/)
-   Intake, Headers and Exhaust (https://www.audiforums.com/forum/intake-headers-exhaust-25/)
-   -   Cold Air Intake vs. Topless K&N (https://www.audiforums.com/forum/intake-headers-exhaust-25/cold-air-intake-vs-topless-k-n-122354/)

krill74 01-08-2009 09:01 AM

Cold Air Intake vs. Topless K&N
 
I just bough a 200 a6 2.7t quattro and i cannot find a stock replacement K&N OR and Cold air intake system for the car. I used to have an A4 3.0 quartto...so the A6 is a new beast for me.

Does anyone have any suggestions, recommendations, etc.....

Jc61990 01-09-2009 01:47 AM

you can always get a K&N Cone filter and just stick it on the other side of the maf. pretty much how most intakes are

matasci 01-09-2009 02:15 PM

your stock unit is more effecent. think cold air where does it come from? if you take all the routeing out and put in a ait filter in the engine compartment. it becomes a hot air intake. cold air denser more oxygen. more combution effecency. leave it stock unless you just wanna kill horse power for sound

Simply Red 01-14-2009 11:08 PM


Originally Posted by matasci (Post 1021985)
your stock unit is more effecent. think cold air where does it come from? if you take all the routeing out and put in a ait filter in the engine compartment. it becomes a hot air intake. cold air denser more oxygen. more combution effecency. leave it stock unless you just wanna kill horse power for sound

Wait, so is that true for the b6 A4 too? I was considering the carbonio... So you're saying it'll actually lower his HP? ...and mine, w/ the A4?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands