Interesting lecture on WTC 7
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,486
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
I never asked why this "take" was not reported in the media... I was curious as to why the footage of WTC 7 coming down was not shown.
The media is market driven... obviously -- they are for-profit orginizations, and they will print what people will buy... you can't deny that.
I haven't even stated my opinion of this, I was just pointing out that there are some curious facts. ... but sarcasm is good too, I guess.
The media is market driven... obviously -- they are for-profit orginizations, and they will print what people will buy... you can't deny that.
I haven't even stated my opinion of this, I was just pointing out that there are some curious facts. ... but sarcasm is good too, I guess.
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,061
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
ORIGINAL: pturbo
I guess that the reason that this take is not widely spread in the media is because the media is all controlled by the CIA.
This is kept secret from the media, kinda like how Toff's whole "the US is using chemical weapons in Iraq" was kept secret and only reported by a professor of "Peace Studies".
Or.....one could draw other conclusions.....
oh yeah, it's all about science...please....
I guess that the reason that this take is not widely spread in the media is because the media is all controlled by the CIA.
This is kept secret from the media, kinda like how Toff's whole "the US is using chemical weapons in Iraq" was kept secret and only reported by a professor of "Peace Studies".
Or.....one could draw other conclusions.....
oh yeah, it's all about science...please....
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,388
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
ORIGINAL: headshok2002
The media is market driven... obviously -- they are for-profit orginizations, and they will print what people will buy... you can't deny that.
The media is market driven... obviously -- they are for-profit orginizations, and they will print what people will buy... you can't deny that.
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,388
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
Why is this guy the only person that knows "the truth"? Why is he speaking at a community college in Utah and not at a serious venue? I have a theory on that. And no conspiracy is required. [8D]
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,061
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
So there is nothing? No comment on why you thing his temperature data is wrong, or how the structualr integrity of the building data is wrong, or why random fires may well allow a building to fall in that symmetrical manner. he spoke in a community college, thus he is wrong. Fantastic reasoning. Fortunately the theory that fire would not be hot enough to cause structural failure has been around for a long time. So is there a proper reason that you don't agree?
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,061
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
have a read... http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,388
From:
RE: Interesting lecture on WTC 7
No, Toff, unlike all of the other experts that know far more than you and me on the subject, I agree with all of his data. Why shouldn't I? It's not like his theories have been completely rejected or anything.
You want to argue about temperature data and I'm telling you that his entire premise is incorrect. How can I speak so boldly on the matter? Because I have everyone else in the entire world (not on the kook Left) on my side. That includes expert after expert and physics teacher after physics teacher. You finding a video on the web of a guy speaking in Utah doesn't change the facts.
A more interesting debate might be regarding who you think blew up any of the WTC buildings and why.
You want to argue about temperature data and I'm telling you that his entire premise is incorrect. How can I speak so boldly on the matter? Because I have everyone else in the entire world (not on the kook Left) on my side. That includes expert after expert and physics teacher after physics teacher. You finding a video on the web of a guy speaking in Utah doesn't change the facts.
A more interesting debate might be regarding who you think blew up any of the WTC buildings and why.