anybody else - speedo over-reporting speed?
Just curious - if anybody else has found that the speedometer in the a3 over-reports by about +2 to +3.5 over your actual speed?
I noticed it on a road trip while comparing speeds on my Garmin Nuvi and the dash a week ago & thought I'd grab a pilot friends Garmin 496 GPS and compare. Well my little Garmin GPS reads { suprisingly } the same as 496 GPS on our ground speed - albeit it's doing so at a much slower sample rate.
So we had both units on the dash - and put the car out on a long straight, flat & non-congested stretch of road and with cruise control holding steady - compared the differences at various speeds.
I we pretty much found that on average the car's speedo over-reports by about +2.65 mph average at any given speed over 35 mph.
Has anyone else noticed this?
2008 2.0t / S_line / Stock Rims & Tyres
I noticed it on a road trip while comparing speeds on my Garmin Nuvi and the dash a week ago & thought I'd grab a pilot friends Garmin 496 GPS and compare. Well my little Garmin GPS reads { suprisingly } the same as 496 GPS on our ground speed - albeit it's doing so at a much slower sample rate.
So we had both units on the dash - and put the car out on a long straight, flat & non-congested stretch of road and with cruise control holding steady - compared the differences at various speeds.
I we pretty much found that on average the car's speedo over-reports by about +2.65 mph average at any given speed over 35 mph.
Has anyone else noticed this?
2008 2.0t / S_line / Stock Rims & Tyres
I actually noticed the same i just drove from tampa to boston and when my cruise control was set at 80 on the speed-o it showed that i was only going 77/78 on the digital screen n the cluster. Pretty wierd.
I once heard that there's a German law that speedometers must never under-report speed, so they all tend to over-report slightly, as shipo suggests. Mine seems to be 2-3mph slow at 70mph, but that is probably true for most of the cars I've owned over many years. If we didn't have inexpensive GPS these days, we wouldn't worry about it!
A bit of reading for you folks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedom...nal_agreements
And for those who don't like to read... long story short: it's normal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedom...nal_agreements
And for those who don't like to read... long story short: it's normal.
That's an interesting bit of reading - I like the disclaimer about gps versus in-car reporting. There's some good truth in there - as well as a lot of allowable variance too - it's also why I was specific about using a flight rated GPS versus my little cheap nuvi consumer unit. { the GPS496 updates at 5hz, which is a lot faster than the Nuvi does. } And we were pretty methodical about the road and distance we tested it on. { straight, flat & abandoned transient / ambient temp approx 82 degrees & the car had been driven so the tyres were warmed up }
I'd expect that a variance of 1-2 mph due to tyre wear / inflation / ambient temperature expansion etc. But 3+ at various temps seems a bit much - I've noticed it in the summer too where mechanicals would be fully expanded { larger rim/tyre/gearing circumference }
bla bla bla... getting waylaid in technicals - can this be fixed/adjusted/corrected?


