Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
#1
Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
So I was having a bit of drag with my friends VW Bora GLI, of course no concerns for me as I have 0.2 ltr and a few more horses under the bonnet than he did. But in discussion afterwards we were wondering if the VW Golf GTi was as fast or faster than the A3 (we're talking stock, off the factory floor, no mods). I mean on paper they both have the same 2.0ltr 200hp turbo-charged engine. The A3 in fact weighs in 200lbs heavier but according the stock specs can do 0-60mph in 6.7s compared to 7.0s for the GTi. So why is this, same engine yet weighing more the A3 is more powerful. Is it because the turbo is tuned for more compression? A more aggressive factory ECU tuning? Just a topic of discussion I thought would be worth bringing to the table for us Audi lovers
[EDIT]; My friends car is a Bora GLI not GTi my mistake
[EDIT]; My friends car is a Bora GLI not GTi my mistake
#2
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
ORIGINAL: quadric
So I was having a bit of drag with my friends VW Bora GTi, of course no concerns for me as I have 0.2 ltr and a few more horses under the bonnet than he did. But in discussion afterwards we were wondering if the VW Golf GTi was as fast or faster than the A3 (we're talking stock, off the factory floor, no mods). I mean on paper they both have the same 2.0ltr 200hp turbo-charged engine. The A3 in fact weighs in 200lbs heavier but according the stock specs can do 0-60mph in 6.7s compared to 7.0s for the GTi. So why is this, same engine yet weighing more the A3 is more powerful. Is it because the turbo is tuned for more compression? A more aggressive factory ECU tuning? Just a topic of discussion I thought would be worth bringing to the table for us Audi lovers
So I was having a bit of drag with my friends VW Bora GTi, of course no concerns for me as I have 0.2 ltr and a few more horses under the bonnet than he did. But in discussion afterwards we were wondering if the VW Golf GTi was as fast or faster than the A3 (we're talking stock, off the factory floor, no mods). I mean on paper they both have the same 2.0ltr 200hp turbo-charged engine. The A3 in fact weighs in 200lbs heavier but according the stock specs can do 0-60mph in 6.7s compared to 7.0s for the GTi. So why is this, same engine yet weighing more the A3 is more powerful. Is it because the turbo is tuned for more compression? A more aggressive factory ECU tuning? Just a topic of discussion I thought would be worth bringing to the table for us Audi lovers
#3
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
GTi: http://www.vw.com/vwcom/content/obje..._gti_specs.pdf
A3: http://www.audiusa.com/audi/us/en2/n....8pa52c_2.html
A3: http://www.audiusa.com/audi/us/en2/n....8pa52c_2.html
#4
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
ORIGINAL: quadric
GTi: http://www.vw.com/vwcom/content/obje..._gti_specs.pdf
A3: http://www.audiusa.com/audi/us/en2/n....8pa52c_2.html
GTi: http://www.vw.com/vwcom/content/obje..._gti_specs.pdf
A3: http://www.audiusa.com/audi/us/en2/n....8pa52c_2.html
VW
2007 Jetta Sedan 2.0T manual weighing 3,259 lbs = 7.1 seconds (0-60)
2007 Jetta Sedan 2.0T DSG weighing 3,303 lbs = 7.0 seconds (0-60)
2007 Jetta GLI Sedan manual weighing 3,290 lbs = 7.1 seconds (0-60)
2007 Jetta GLI Sedan 2.0T DSG weighing 3,334 lbs = 7.0 seconds (0-60)
2007 GTI -2dr 2.0T manual weighing 3,100 lbs = 7.0 seconds (0-60)
2007 GTI -2dr 2.0T DSG weighing 3,150 lbs = 6.9 seconds (0-60)
2007 GTI -4dr 2.0T manual weighing 3,161 lbs = 7.0 seconds (0-60)
2007 GTI -4dr 2.0T DSG weighing 3,212 lbs = 6.9 seconds (0-60)
Audi
2007 A3 2.0T Manual weighing 3329 lbs =6.7 seconds (0-100 km/h)
2007 A3 2.0T DSG weighing 3329 lbs = 6.7 seconds (0-100 km/h)
2008 TT 2.0T DSG Coupe weighing 2,965 lbs = 6.1 seconds (0-100 km/h)
2007 A3 3.2 V6 Quattro DSG weighing 3660 lbs = 5.9 seconds (0-100 km/h)
2008 TT 3.2 V6 Quattro 6 speed coupe weighing 3,218 lbs = 5.5 seconds (0-100 km/h)
It would appear that Audi is not as conservative as VW in acceleration specs is my opinion. What I find amazing is how fast the 2008 TT is versus the A3 for given engine. The TT is 364 less pounds.
#7
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
0.3 seconds is attributable to just driver error. Also, the A3 manual isn't supposed to be equal to the DSG, cause in a straigt line, it isn't. The DSG shifts faster then any human ever could have a prayer of doing, of course the manual usually has the launch advantage. The DSG i test drove lagged off the line until the clutch fully engaged, manual you can keep the engine in the torque band to launch, so its a tough call. Skill vs brainless driving(no offense DSG owners!)
Chip the car and who cares? You'll blow away an A3 3.2.
Chip the car and who cares? You'll blow away an A3 3.2.
#8
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
ORIGINAL: falcompsx
Also, the A3 manual isn't supposed to be equal to the DSG, cause in a straigt line, it isn't. The DSG shifts faster then any human ever could have a prayer of doing, of course the manual usually has the launch advantage.
Also, the A3 manual isn't supposed to be equal to the DSG, cause in a straigt line, it isn't. The DSG shifts faster then any human ever could have a prayer of doing, of course the manual usually has the launch advantage.
#10
RE: Why is the A3 faster than the VW GTi in stock spec
ORIGINAL: bpw
what is the performance of an A3 2 .0T DSG after its beenchipped? Any one know? And doesit damage the engine life if you only use the increased acceleration on an infrequent basis.
what is the performance of an A3 2 .0T DSG after its beenchipped? Any one know? And doesit damage the engine life if you only use the increased acceleration on an infrequent basis.