RX-8 or 350 Z
#24
RE: RX-8 or 350 Z
Yea, I think I remember you saying something about english or lack there of...
What are your origins if you dont mind me asking.
YOU BETTER BE DAMN SURE YOU WATCH WHAT YOU POST OR I WILL KEEL YOU!.. YEA YOU HEARD RIGHT KEEL!...
WTF IS KEEL? WHY AM I SHOUTING? WHY IM I USING CAPS?
Edit:
Keel:
the median ridge on the breastbone of birds that fly
Yea so you heard right! Im going to the median ridge on the breastbone of birds that fly you!
What are your origins if you dont mind me asking.
Original: glen
Im almost too afraid to post in case someone SHOUTS at me . Its getting a bit lairy in here.
Im almost too afraid to post in case someone SHOUTS at me . Its getting a bit lairy in here.
WTF IS KEEL? WHY AM I SHOUTING? WHY IM I USING CAPS?
Edit:
Keel:
the median ridge on the breastbone of birds that fly
Yea so you heard right! Im going to the median ridge on the breastbone of birds that fly you!
#25
RE: RX-8 or 350 Z
ORIGINAL: glen
Im almost too afraid to post in case someone SHOUTS at me . Its getting a bit lairy in here.
Im almost too afraid to post in case someone SHOUTS at me . Its getting a bit lairy in here.
Anyhoo to get on topic...
350Z
PRO - great engine, sounds amazing stock, looks good, heritage, sound build quality, decent handling
CON - tire feathering issue!!! too heavy and feels heavier than it is, under-performing imho, everyone has one?
RX8
PRO - One of the best handling, best balanced cars that I have driven, drivetrain works in total sync, looks awesome, true 4 seater, cool interior design, shifter/clutch combo close to the S2000, 9500 RPMs!!!!, sound of the rotary is amazingly unique, high quality interior materials and decent textures. You can get them for $8000 msrp brand new.
CON - underpowered, lack of TQ, under-performing, sucks gas, sucks oil, easy for inexperienced drivers to flood the engine.
If I had to choose I go with the RX8. Just more fun overall.
EDIT: And to keep it A4 relative. You can't really compare them fairly as 2 are technically sports cars and one is a sports sedan.
#26
RE: RX-8 or 350 Z
I dont even think the a4 is technically a "sports" sedan... lol
CON - underpowered, lack of TQ, under-performing, sucks gas, sucks oil, easy for inexperienced drivers to flood the engine.
that alone is enough to make me not buy it ... not including the uggo looks (my opinion)
the Nissan VQ motor is a great motor and can handle i think around 400WHP.
350z is slow in stock form... but you have to REALLY hammer it to take its potenial due to nissans DBW technique
CON - underpowered, lack of TQ, under-performing, sucks gas, sucks oil, easy for inexperienced drivers to flood the engine.
that alone is enough to make me not buy it ... not including the uggo looks (my opinion)
the Nissan VQ motor is a great motor and can handle i think around 400WHP.
350z is slow in stock form... but you have to REALLY hammer it to take its potenial due to nissans DBW technique
#27
RE: RX-8 or 350 Z
ORIGINAL: InsaneHatter
350z is slow in stock form... but you have to REALLY hammer it to take its potenial due to nissans DBW technique
350z is slow in stock form... but you have to REALLY hammer it to take its potenial due to nissans DBW technique
#29
RE: RX-8 or 350 Z
rx8 is a lame attempt to re-create something it'll never be. the z can be made pretty fast, but if u leave it stock, why not get the longer wheelbase g35. both have a bunch of potential, i just prefer the infinity, except for its roof liner, i think kia has a better one.