View Poll Results: A poll
engine swap to 98 and supercharging?
0
0%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll
twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
#1
07-29-2005, 03:28 PM
twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
help me out, just so many choices to make the power but im looking for about 600hp but ill defiantly be happy with 400hp! which is the best option for my money i have a limit of about 15000...
#2
07-29-2005, 03:31 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
if u have 15k get a 1.8t and make it a 2.0 with a gt3071 turbo setup with a fully built engine. ull be 500hp easily
#5
07-29-2005, 03:59 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
wouldnt it be cheaper to get the 96 because i can find thos al day for 6k and then bore it out for 2k and twin turbo for another 3 to 4k insted of the 1.8 start at like 8k at least and it would be pretty expensive to buy the 1.8 and bore out the engine and cams and rockers and all that good stuff when i can save 2 to 3k by getting the 96...what do you think?
#6
07-29-2005, 04:17 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
If you get a 96' for 6K it's gonna have 150,000 miles on it. That's not much to start an engine buildup on. Even if you replace all internals, you've still got your tranny and fornt and rear diffs which aren't gonna hold 600hp long.
#7
07-29-2005, 04:58 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
30V>12V
1.8T>12V
2.7T>12V
2.7TT>12V
The 96 is only worth it's slightly better reliability. You're not going to make the kind of power you want out of the 12V without a lot of extra work. Not to mention it's going to cost you about 1.5k in engine management alone.
I've researched it. Everyway possible, it's completely doable. Worth it, negative.
BTW a big single turbo is more reliable and will make more power. Ever wonder why the fastest supras (I just picked a random factory TT, T and NA car) are single turbo?
My opinion, either the 98 30V and SC it. Which should net you around ~250 to the wheels.
Or
a 1.8T and start modifying that. Chip, DP, DV, exhaust, K04.
1.8T>12V
2.7T>12V
2.7TT>12V
The 96 is only worth it's slightly better reliability. You're not going to make the kind of power you want out of the 12V without a lot of extra work. Not to mention it's going to cost you about 1.5k in engine management alone.
I've researched it. Everyway possible, it's completely doable. Worth it, negative.
BTW a big single turbo is more reliable and will make more power. Ever wonder why the fastest supras (I just picked a random factory TT, T and NA car) are single turbo?
My opinion, either the 98 30V and SC it. Which should net you around ~250 to the wheels.
Or
a 1.8T and start modifying that. Chip, DP, DV, exhaust, K04.
#8
07-29-2005, 05:12 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
what do u need 400 up in an audi for?
buy a stock na 95 supra and build that, not as complicated, more airodynamic, and there is way more help for u on the supra fourms rather than us, who only reach like 350hp max
buy a stock na 95 supra and build that, not as complicated, more airodynamic, and there is way more help for u on the supra fourms rather than us, who only reach like 350hp max
#10
07-29-2005, 05:21 PM
RE: twin turbo? or '98 engine swap s/c?
ORIGINAL: luvin_the_rings
what do u need 400 up in an audi for?
buy a stock na 95 supra and build that, not as complicated, more airodynamic, and there is way more help for u on the supra fourms rather than us, who only reach like 350hp max
what do u need 400 up in an audi for?
buy a stock na 95 supra and build that, not as complicated, more airodynamic, and there is way more help for u on the supra fourms rather than us, who only reach like 350hp max
i say buy the S4 and mod that thing, at lease wit an audi you wont spin out from having to much power to the rear wheels