You've been heard and talked about 1.8 T vs 2.8 for long long time. so how about....
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 31
From:
You've been heard and talked about 1.8 T vs 2.8 for long long time. so how about....
2.0 T vs 3.2 ?
is it justanother story linelike the battle of past trims? or is there something new?
give me ur opinions!!![:@]
is it justanother story linelike the battle of past trims? or is there something new?
give me ur opinions!!![:@]
Site Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,664
RE: You've been heard and talked about 1.8 T vs 2.8 for long long time. so how about....
Same arguments, different engines.
Smooth reliable power
or
Ability to have a 3.2 eating monster that requires a little tlc.
I dont even think there is a super charger for the 3.2.
You can bring a 2.0T to stock 3.2 power with a chip just like 1.8t chips bring you to 2.8 power (and then some).
Smooth reliable power
or
Ability to have a 3.2 eating monster that requires a little tlc.
I dont even think there is a super charger for the 3.2.
You can bring a 2.0T to stock 3.2 power with a chip just like 1.8t chips bring you to 2.8 power (and then some).
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
From:
RE: You've been heard and talked about 1.8 T vs 2.8 for long long time. so how about....
ORIGINAL: hiwords
it's not rly wut is better. it's more dependent on wut u want.
it's not rly wut is better. it's more dependent on wut u want.
ya this is basically do you want modability, or smooth decent reliable power. its like trying to compare macs or PC's. both have their up's and downs
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 86
From: Chicago
RE: You've been heard and talked about 1.8 T vs 2.8 for long long time. so how about....
I don't understand- which one's the PC and which one is the Mac? 2.0 or 3.2.
I'd go with a 3.2 myself if I had the option.
[align=left] [/align]
I'd go with a 3.2 myself if I had the option.
[align=left] [/align]
