Audi TT The Audi TT line, in both the coupe and roadster combines Audi's All Wheel Drive performance with the feel of a European sports car.

180 Vs. 225 head to head. Dyno added

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #11  
ooantipostoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 314
From:
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

Yep just with boost and diode. I have a full 3inch downpipe tohi-flow cat then straight back 3inch to aeroturbine almost like a glass pack kind of deal. Greddy profec A boost controller with realtime vac/boost guage with overtake boost option. Autometer Air fuel ratio meter, auto meter boost gauge, ECS clutch, light weight flywheel, forge DV, all motor mounts have been tig welded for more throttle response and torque, stock intercooler remounted side ways with the plastic cut out behind the bumper where the grill is at the bottom for better air flow and new piping so its not just that squished 1 inch (grill is still there). Waste gate has been adjusted to hold higher boost at top of gear so it doesnt drop off like normal.Wal 255 fuel pump, fully adjustable FPR from 30-80 psi.
Add and my mech has played around with timing and fuel ratio and such.
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #12  
.clipse's Avatar
SoCal Crew Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,819
From: L.A.
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

^ gotta be the juice
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #13  
ooantipostoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 314
From:
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

With the juice im prob around 320-350hp.
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #14  
Mobius97's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 600
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

Very NICE!!!!
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #15  
ooantipostoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 314
From:
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

Hmm, ive got to be doing something right ; /. Cant wait to go BT
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #16  
Murderface's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,198
From:
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

FWD cars have a massive weight advantage.
I remember it being 250ish pounds for the coupes...it's roughly the difference between just having yourself in the car and having a fat person riding with you :P

ooantipostoo, you fwd not quattro ay? How's your traction running that much juice?
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
eliTTe's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,354
From: Columbia, SC
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

whats the difference between the red and blue numbers?
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #18  
Murderface's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,198
From:
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

ORIGINAL: eliTTe

whats the difference between the red and blue numbers?
Two different runs.
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #19  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

You should probably mention thats estamated crank #'s, not whp. ALso cranking the wastegate is like smoking, it really shortens its lifespan

Also since the estamated peak TQ is much farther down the rpm range, it explains the higher hp numbers compared to TQ. If you went to a real dyno, im sure the TQ numbers would be close (~230ish), but the hp's would be much lower (yours 221whp but will be closer to 210whp). Again thats due to where in the rpm band peak TQ accures.
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #20  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: 180 Vs. 225 head to head.

ORIGINAL: Murderface

FWD cars have a massive weight advantage.
I remember it being 250ish pounds for the coupes...it's roughly the difference between just having yourself in the car and having a fat person riding with you :P
Oh, im sorry, and the less drivetrain loss....better?
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.