B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

OK so why

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #1  
gen2roller's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 242
From:
Default OK so why

I drove a 98 audi 2.8 for 9 months, and upgraded to the one in my sig. My new car is seriously significantly faster than my old car, like really rips it up compared to my old one. I even hit what I assume was the restrictive ECU at 125, I never got up that fast in my old one. But what might be some reasons this one is faster or that one was sluuggish?
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 01:17 PM
  #2  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

If the one in your sig is a 30v that might have something to do with it. Its possible someone chipped it and you didn't know about it?
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
jeffha4's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 105
From: North Salt Lake, UT
Default

I don't think it's chipped. As far as I know, most chips remove the speed regulator. Although I could be wrong. Give us some more info on the car... Is this one also a 2.8? Or are you now in a turbo?
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #4  
hiwords's Avatar
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7,728
From: noob from NY
Default

the 98s are 30v too. like CCA4 said that one might be chipped. i know the speedtuning chip made a good difference in my car. you get more lower end torque and the power is much more usable which makes it feel fast.
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
onepoint8tee's Avatar
Site Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,664
Default

Unless something was wrong with your old car to slow it down, it's probably the difference between dbc and dbw. With dbw, anything past 60% or so is read as 90+% by the ecu and the engine reacts accordingly. So it might not be that it's a lot faster than the old one, but there is just less pedal effort which could give the impression of more power....? Could be chipped I guess but I wouldnt assume that.
 

Last edited by onepoint8tee; Jan 14, 2009 at 03:40 PM.
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #6  
somebody5788's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,023
From: Warsaw, IN
Default

The rack on the roof adds hp
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #7  
gen2roller's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 242
From:
Default

Originally Posted by somebody5788
The rack on the roof adds hp
No silly, it holds skis! Haha, I don't think it's chipped because like someone said doesn't it remove the speed limiter? I def. couldn't go faster than 125. More responsive pedals could be it, sounds like that might right?
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 11:30 PM
  #8  
Lut3s's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 125
From: Cincyish
Default

Those resemble the facelift 1.8t stock rims.
 
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 12:30 AM
  #9  
gen2roller's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 242
From:
Default

yah but they're 16"s
 
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 01:38 AM
  #10  
xqwizit's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 171
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

I think a few of us are still waiting to hear the answer if your new ride is a 2.8 or a 1.8T.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.