B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

and the project begins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
ghost6303's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default and the project begins

just finished cleaning it up. picked it up today from a guy off vortex. it was encrusted with road grime but physicly its in great shape. plans are to have it overbored +1mm and drop the compression ratio to 9.0:1. i figured if i have to replace rods to do what i want with the car, i might as well build a spare engine so i dont have any downtime. and of course if i have the chance i might as well increase displacement...

Name:  0909081922a.jpg
Views: 72
Size:  68.9 KB

Name:  0909081921.jpg
Views: 66
Size:  67.1 KB

Name:  0909081921a.jpg
Views: 83
Size:  88.4 KB

Name:  0909081921b.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  80.9 KB
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
trevor303's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 92
From: Colorado
Default

looks like fun

good luck on your project
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
Got2Speed's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 138
From: Hard Hittin New Britain
Default

heyy just a quick question about how much will the rods and stuff cost plus the cleaning??....and what were the signs the internals were damaged??
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #4  
ghost6303's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default

i havnt actualy purchased rods n pistons and whatnot yet. scatt rods are around $400, pauter rods are around $750, which of those depends on what HP numbers and turbo i decide on. pistons and rings are around $600 per set. im just reusing the stock crank which is why im not going 2.0L. i have no idea what they are goin to charge for the overbore/hone but they usualy steam clean the block before they do that anyways.

some signs of damage would be deep scoring or gouges in the cylinder walls, cracks anywhere, any signs of metal on metal contact. the crank thats in there turns effortlessly, no grinding/binding which is a good thing. same thing with the intermediate shaft.

if you really want to be sure you can have the block x-ray'd for internal flaws and micro cracks but thats not usualy necessary unless you are going for ultra high HP.
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 10:32 PM
  #5  
hiwords's Avatar
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7,728
From: noob from NY
Default

you'll want to keep in touch with cincytt while you're building. what turbo you thinking about? gt3071r possibly? what standalone?
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 11:47 PM
  #6  
ghost6303's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default

im thinking 2871r. that will make around the power im lookin for. the +1mm will just help it spool that much faster. its a daily driver and i really dont need more power then that.

im mostly doing this to learn how, and since its a spare engine i can spend as much time as i need on it. im looking into going to school for this stuff in january so this is kind of a crash course before i do that.

do you think i really need standalone as opposed to my origional idea of getting a unitronics bt file and having it fine tuned on a dyno?
 
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #7  
hiwords's Avatar
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7,728
From: noob from NY
Default

iono mayn. pm cincytt for expert advice lol. i don't think you'll need standalone with that turbo though. so i'm guessing you're going with scat rods? you're gonna have everything weighed and balanced though right? o you might want to invest in a MBC if you don't already have one. a turbo timer will help too
 
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #8  
ghost6303's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default

update... picked up a new head and cams, back from the machine shop, mild grind on the valves, opened up the bowl a little for some better flow. its nice and shiney

Name:  0916081352.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  97.8 KB

Name:  0916081352b.jpg
Views: 69
Size:  88.1 KB

Name:  0916081353a.jpg
Views: 80
Size:  85.9 KB

Name:  0916081354.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  75.3 KB
 
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
qUaTtRoA4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,953
From: Redding, California 1998.5 A4 1.8TQM
Default

looks good!....what kind of time frame are you lookin at?....would like to see it in the car and running!
 
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #10  
euro_2nr's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,503
From: Illi-noice
Default

You're far from standalone so don't worry bout that. Besides you wouldn't pass emissions. Who did you choose for mani? 2871r is the best DD so far IMO. Sounds like all you needed were rods but its cool you're still going through with the rest. What made you stay with the crank and lower comp?

Hiwords: you're thinking of an EBC I believe, which is also unnecessary, instead of a turbo timer
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM.