B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #21  
bolob5's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 130
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

I picked up a stage three -SB- today and will post all the pics later next week when the job is done. Thanks for all the input guys.
 
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #22  
bolob5's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 130
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

Update of the weekend...

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...4/HPIM1144.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...4/HPIM1143.jpg

More to follow.
 
Old Mar 29, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #23  
Mr. Merk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
From:
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

i had a spec stage 3 in my mustang and literally fell apart, thepressure platefell apart in 2 pcs
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #24  
bolob5's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 130
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

Well I got the clutch and 034 mount in today and the car rocks... Grabs nice and hard and it still has a stock feel to it, even though it is a stage 3... Southbend is by far the way to go for your 'performance' needs. I will write back in a week or so once it has broken in.
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #25  
jonus079's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 403
From:
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

dont get a spec clutch!!!!! Never Never Never!!! they suck. I personally know of 4 different people with 4 different cars who have tried spec clutches and three of them have had significant problems to where the clutch had to be replaced again. it doesn’t seem like its a problem with the clutch but rather with quality control. i know they offer a guarantee but trust me you don’t want to replace you clutch and find out its bad and have to take it out again. its not like you can just pop it out and send it back to spec especially if you are paying someone to do the work.
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #26  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

This about sums it up

Name:  march21078.jpg
Views: 28
Size:  51.1 KB
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 11:28 PM
  #27  
jonus079's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 403
From:
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

this clutch was rated for 650 horsepower. they were only putting 400 horsepower thru it.

 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #28  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

But what was the tq rating and actual tq being made?
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #29  
jonus079's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 403
From:
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

i ment to say torque not horsepower. it was a stage 3 clutch. for that clutch the ratings are

Stage 1 = 425tq
Stage 2 = 530tq
Stage 2+ = 620tq
Stage 3 = 680tq
Stage 3+ = 850tq
Stage 4 = 700tq
Stage 5 = 1200tq

i also saw a spec clutch where the rivets that hold the pucks in failed and the puck came flying out heavly damaging the transmission and distroying the flywheel. wish i could find the pcitures. anyway here a stage 3+ clutch rated for 850tq after only 3500 miles

Name:  100_0988.jpg
Views: 22
Size:  64.8 KB

bottom line, if you get a spec clutch you might be ok but with the large number of failures people are reporting i would NEVER NEVER NEVER take the risk!
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #30  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: Southbendclutch vs. Specclutch

ORIGINAL: jonus079


bottom line, if you get a spec clutch you might be ok but with the large number of failures people are reporting i would NEVER NEVER NEVER take the risk!
That is exactly what i tell people
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.