Weaksauce dyno
#22
RE: Weaksauce dyno
ORIGINAL: bcs296
I assume from your sig that the car is an automatic? It may or may not have been a factor but typically automatics eat up more power through the drivetrain than a standard.
I assume from your sig that the car is an automatic? It may or may not have been a factor but typically automatics eat up more power through the drivetrain than a standard.
Josh
#28
RE: Weaksauce dyno
ORIGINAL: cincyTT
Not much more than a ko3(s) pushed the same way.
ko3 rated 195hp
ko3s rated 215hp
ko4 rated 220hp
Dues that sum it up enough?
Not much more than a ko3(s) pushed the same way.
ko3 rated 195hp
ko3s rated 215hp
ko4 rated 220hp
Dues that sum it up enough?
Yes, thats what their rated at, but it doesnt excuse the fact of what their capable of. Dont wanna get into an argument, just saying look at the actual numbers from them, the k04 puts out more power.
#29
RE: Weaksauce dyno
<offtopic>
Here is the k03s vs. k04.
www.audiworld.com/news/99/turbo/lo4lko4r1.jpg
</offtopic>
I dont want to embed it because it's a huge picture and will screw up the margins.
Here is the k03s vs. k04.
www.audiworld.com/news/99/turbo/lo4lko4r1.jpg
</offtopic>
I dont want to embed it because it's a huge picture and will screw up the margins.
#30
RE: Weaksauce dyno
I do believe you can squeeze more power out of a K04 than you can out of a K03 -- albeit they are the same turbo. I think that comparing the properties of the turbocharger itself is retarded, because the tuning and supporting modifications are what really allow more power to flow.
And I don't mean to say this to start an argument, but that's just how I view it.
And I don't mean to say this to start an argument, but that's just how I view it.