whats with all these naturally aspirated systems, no turbos? common, whats so S or RS about that?!

yea the powerblock is nice, a nice hefty v8, but wats the point if there is no turbo! mite as well call em A's again. i mean whats next? the s3's with a v8?!

 

I agree... thats why i went with the twin turbo S4. The REAL S4.

 

Yeah i've been saying the same thing since the announced the engine. I'm pretty dissapointed that they are n/a cars. [:@]

 

think they did it cuz they had so many problems with the turbos or somethin?

 

that is with out a doubt why they did it... tired of replacing 2 turbos with the car under warenty

 

Yeah Audi is tired of footing the bill for people chipping their engine and then experiencing premature blown turbos.

 

bastards...

 

The "S" and "RS" monikers were always used to signify a vehicle that came from the Audi performance arm of Audi AG. So, it has less to do with a turbocharged engine, but rather, Audi AG's line of performance oriented cars.

Although, I agree with you purists who enjoy a great turbocharged car, I understand the financial risk that Audi undertook with the twin turbos. What I don't like and understand is the blurring of the Audi car lines with addition of the "S Line" from Audi. The "Sport" packages don't allow for a distinct line of performance cars.

 

definatly with ya there Imola.

 

i stand by my choice of words...