Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...
Some of you old timers will remember all those debates we have had. Some of you might even remember that 2.0T vs 3.2 review I posted (on vortex). Some said it was biased, some thought other wise. So here's a more "objective" review from Automobile about a Chipped 2.0T GTI vs the 3.2 R32.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...son/index.html
Very similar to my review, in a straight line, the chipped 2.0T is a beast. That 7 second difference to 130 mph is really impressive. But on the other hand, on the track, that power/torque of the 2.0T just adds to the understeer and wheel spin, where the R32 is much easier to drive.
Good read.
P.S. Chef, I'm still waiting for our date up North.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...son/index.html
Very similar to my review, in a straight line, the chipped 2.0T is a beast. That 7 second difference to 130 mph is really impressive. But on the other hand, on the track, that power/torque of the 2.0T just adds to the understeer and wheel spin, where the R32 is much easier to drive.
Good read.
P.S. Chef, I'm still waiting for our date up North.
Chef is currently broke, saving money for the house being built. Definitely a good read and seems like a reasonably accurate test. Quattro is a big advantage on a tight track.
Cheers!
Cheers!
ORIGINAL: stryker
All i would like audi to do to the A3 is give it 300 hp and quattro, that will be inline to compete with subaru, mitsubishi, BMW, and dodge.
All i would like audi to do to the A3 is give it 300 hp and quattro, that will be inline to compete with subaru, mitsubishi, BMW, and dodge.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




