Audi A3 The Audi A3 offers cutting edge engineering, performance, and luxury in one affordable package.

Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #1  
eltonsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 322
From: Toronto
Default Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

Some of you old timers will remember all those debates we have had. Some of you might even remember that 2.0T vs 3.2 review I posted (on vortex). Some said it was biased, some thought other wise. So here's a more "objective" review from Automobile about a Chipped 2.0T GTI vs the 3.2 R32.

http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...son/index.html

Very similar to my review, in a straight line, the chipped 2.0T is a beast. That 7 second difference to 130 mph is really impressive. But on the other hand, on the track, that power/torque of the 2.0T just adds to the understeer and wheel spin, where the R32 is much easier to drive.

Good read.


P.S. Chef, I'm still waiting for our date up North.
 
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 09:50 PM
  #2  
BAMF's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 906
From:
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

::sigh::... this debate would be solved quickly if Audi would give us the 2.0T w/ Quattro[:@]

BTW, your link doesn't work.
 
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #3  
eltonsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 322
From: Toronto
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

fixed.

And the 2.0TQ is coming in 2009. Pretty reliable source. Then again, 2010 will be next generation. Audi should bring over the S3, period.
 
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #4  
Chef's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,713
From: Cibolo, TX
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

Chef is currently broke, saving money for the house being built. Definitely a good read and seems like a reasonably accurate test. Quattro is a big advantage on a tight track.



Cheers!
 
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
stryker's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 577
From:
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

All i would like audi to do to the A3 is give it 300 hp and quattro, that will be inline to compete with subaru, mitsubishi, BMW, and dodge.
 
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
ottoaudi's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 99
From:
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

totally agree on that one stryker
 
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
eltonsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 322
From: Toronto
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

ORIGINAL: stryker

All i would like audi to do to the A3 is give it 300 hp and quattro, that will be inline to compete with subaru, mitsubishi, BMW, and dodge.
Let's hope they give the S3 9P with the S4 B8 engine... Twin Turbo 6 cyclinder... mmmmm... And bring it over to NA.
 
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #8  
Phildo's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 79
Default RE: Chipped 2.0T vs 3.2 revisited...

No mention of the dump valve...am i reading this correct?

Can you get away with this?
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 09:42 PM
  #9  
massboykie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 59
From:
Talking

Originally Posted by BAMF
::sigh::... this debate would be solved quickly if Audi would give us the 2.0T w/ Quattro[:@]
Isn't that called the A4?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
silverd2
Audi A8
1
Jan 21, 2011 08:49 PM
Threeputt
Audi A3
17
Nov 23, 2009 04:33 PM
achTTung
Audi TT
41
Dec 1, 2007 12:44 PM
tealetm
Audi A4
3
Jan 11, 2006 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 PM.