Audi A4 The Audi A4 model offers nimble handling and performance that makes it one of the leading cars in its class. Read more about the Audi A4 in the Audi A4 review.

which engine would you chose>???

Old Oct 1, 2012 | 08:52 PM
  #1  
fabchef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Default which engine would you chose>???

Hi everyone, I just wanted to know which of these engines would you choose and why???
1.8T, 2.0T, 2.7T or 3.2L????
From what i heard,,the 1.8's always seemed to have some issues (mech. and electical)
the 2.0T seems to be a good engine...
the 2.7 I hear had some issues, especially with the turbo's
and the 3,2L where just BAD...
am i right with any/all of these?
This would be for either an A4 or A6 car..
love to hear your input..
thanks
fab
 
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 01:32 PM
  #2  
budhani786's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Default

Originally Posted by fabchef
Hi everyone, I just wanted to know which of these engines would you choose and why???
1.8T, 2.0T, 2.7T or 3.2L????
From what i heard,,the 1.8's always seemed to have some issues (mech. and electical)
the 2.0T seems to be a good engine...
the 2.7 I hear had some issues, especially with the turbo's
and the 3,2L where just BAD...
am i right with any/all of these?
This would be for either an A4 or A6 car..
love to hear your input..
thanks
fab
2.7t in a6. Because it is very tunable and very stout and powerful from the factory. The turbos are an issue but if cared fOr properly they will boost happily for the cars life.

The biggest problem is some people don't wait until the oil temp is high enough for WOT. Some other problem is over boosting.
 
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
fabchef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Default

Hi Bud, thanks for writting. Glad to see you like the 2.7T...i know what you mean about turbo operation...i'm the same way, when i start my volvo, i wait till the revs come down to where they should and start to drive easily until the temp is where it should be. If i have to stomp on it, i'll wait until i've been drving for a bit. Once i've arrived to my final stop, i put it in park and let it idle for maybe 30sec...this a good habit?
I also do my oil changes every 5-6000km...RELIGIOUSLY!!! it always bugs me when i hear people say "oh, the dealer said" or "the manual says to change oil every 12-15000 km..i find this to be wayyy to long. Oils are oils..they all break down. I think this is a major problem for most cars today cause they will break down quicker and/or develop sludge..
fabs
 
Old Oct 3, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
budhani786's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Default

Originally Posted by fabchef
Hi Bud, thanks for writting. Glad to see you like the 2.7T...i know what you mean about turbo operation...i'm the same way, when i start my volvo, i wait till the revs come down to where they should and start to drive easily until the temp is where it should be. If i have to stomp on it, i'll wait until i've been drving for a bit. Once i've arrived to my final stop, i put it in park and let it idle for maybe 30sec...this a good habit?
I also do my oil changes every 5-6000km...RELIGIOUSLY!!! it always bugs me when i hear people say "oh, the dealer said" or "the manual says to change oil every 12-15000 km..i find this to be wayyy to long. Oils are oils..they all break down. I think this is a major problem for most cars today cause they will break down quicker and/or develop sludge..
fabs
Yes the cool down is a very good way to ensure proper turbo cool down. Another way would be to just take it easy when destination is close. Start drivin gently when you are 1-2 miles away from your destination and let it idle for 10secs and turn off.

I also change the oil on my 2.7 every 4-4500 miles.
I change early because most of my miles are city driving and engine oil gets to operating temp very rarely.

There have been some UOA done on some 2.7 with 7k on it and the report came back rather well, but it's mostly highway.
 
Old Oct 4, 2012 | 05:27 PM
  #5  
fabchef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Default difference...3.0 VS 3.2L??

Hi there..so besides the HP difference and engine size, are there any differences between the two? are they both good and reliable?
I've seen some A4's, one with one engine and one with the other.
My reasoning is that i think i would prefer a N/A engine vs a turbo. I'm a little iffy on the turbo's in these cars and prefer a non turbo. I know that the 3.2L (in a 2006 A4) is a chain driven...right? Is the 3.0 the same (in a 2005 A4 wagon)?
thanks
fabs
 
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 07:52 AM
  #6  
budhani786's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Default

Originally Posted by fabchef
Hi there..so besides the HP difference and engine size, are there any differences between the two? are they both good and reliable?
I've seen some A4's, one with one engine and one with the other.
My reasoning is that i think i would prefer a N/A engine vs a turbo. I'm a little iffy on the turbo's in these cars and prefer a non turbo. I know that the 3.2L (in a 2006 A4) is a chain driven...right? Is the 3.0 the same (in a 2005 A4 wagon)?
thanks
fabs
I can speak for the 3.0:
Common failures (major): catalyst converters. The 3.0s have converters failing at a very high rate and changing it is very very hard.

Cam lobes failure. Results in engine replacement or cam replacements. Both are very exPensive.

Honestly I have read that the 3.0 is harder to work on than the 2.7 or 4.2. The timing belt is also harder on the 3.0.

If you want reliable you CANNOT go wrong with the 2.8. That engine is the corolla of Audi.

Dont know much about the b7 or b8 platform, but if the 2,0 is FSI It is my understanding that the 2.0 with fsi have the same cam lobe issues as the jettas with 2.0t fsi have.

Also all fsi engines are prone to carbon buildup thanks to direct injection.
 

Last edited by budhani786; Oct 5, 2012 at 07:54 AM.
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 12:07 AM
  #7  
redline380's Avatar
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default

id choose the 1.8t. i own one, so i know a lot about them. there a bit older, so more general knowledge about them and aftermarket support. most importanly, no fsi bullshit to deal with. they are much easier to work on than the 2.7 because of space. if you take the time to learn about the 1.8, and maintain it well, it will be a great engine for many miles
 
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 05:59 PM
  #8  
Rdub's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Default

I chose and would certainly choose again, the 3.2. Great match to the A4 cabrio in terms of power, smoothness and balance for the vehicle overall--not sure where the "just bad" part of that comes from... Had a 2.0T version as a dealer loaner during maintenance and we really did not like the 2.0T at all.

Had a 1.8 225hp in a TT at one point, no issues, but it was not as smooth as the 3.2

Had a 2.8 in a previous GTI, smooth, no engine issues, but it seemed to nose heavy in the car

Drive em all. Better yet, see if there's a way to rent or borrow each for a week or so. See for yourself.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A4 SyN
B7 Models
14
Jul 26, 2020 03:21 AM
curtmon03
Archive - Vehicles for Sale
0
Mar 19, 2012 08:35 PM
curtmon03
Archive - Vehicles for Sale
0
Oct 4, 2011 07:49 PM
Mikezip007
New Member Welcome Area
0
Jun 16, 2010 07:53 AM
Franz
Audi A4
36
Nov 4, 2005 11:19 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.