I think that around '97 the 2.8 V6 went from 174 - 193 bhp. </P>


I heard that the 193 bhp's are a bit more reliable...</P>


cya</P>


Steve</P>

 

the 96-97 v6 were 12v at 174 from 98 on they changed to the 30v at 193</P>


why does everyonerag on the 12v engine mine runs good and has never had any oil leaks or reliability probs </P>

 

[Deleted by Admins]

 

<BLOCKQUOTE>Quote: Originally posted by rotorgasm on 09 March 2003
<HR>



i am in the same boat as you gooseguy. i have decided to put my 93 Mazda RX7 twin turbo up for sale because i cannot keep up with it financially.
<HR>
</P></BLOCKQUOTE>


the Change Engine light ?? <img border="0" src= smileys/smiley2.gif></P>


just messing with you, i wish i could get an RX-7, too bad they are unreliable though unless you dump thousands into maintenance, the engine has alot of potential though.
</P>

 

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


.I was wondering if the 97 and 98 are ok? </P></BLOCKQUOTE>


I drive the crap out of my 1.8 and its still going strong after 105K miles. And it's chipped too.</P>