you should kno this forum is b5 dominate

 

Spence, I dont think those nums are accurate, mind giving a source. Both were around mid 5s last i checked. I know the b5 is 5.4.

 

yup

 

First of all, that site sucks, its old, outdated, and tested very well. Just read about it at the top. I would suggest using car&driver, road&track, and car point for the most accurate.

 

i just go to the first thing that pops up on google when i'm lazy man. what would the site being old have anything to do with it? do 0-60 times from 2000 change the older the site is? like a wine?

and...
Car and Driver on the 2004 S4: 0-60 mph 5.1 seconds (versus the other sites 4.9)
Didn't quickly find C&D for 2000 S4, but most of the ratings were btw 5.4 and 5.9. how's audiworld? 5.9

so... correction V8>biturboV6
2004 0-60: 5.1
2000 0-60: 5.9

so taht .6 sec gap just turned into .8

 

Yeah, im lazy like that too. But that site is nothing more then a database that people send in timeslips.And yes, i know audiworld is high. Im fairly sure it was agreed on that 5.4 for the v6s and low 5s for the v8s. Alough we all know what a chipped v6 would do to them

 

Jest, was it somewhere that said the chipped b7s are going to make near 270hp?With a ko3,I have one Q for ya, How?

 

high boost and crazy timing

 

That's what MTM is saying chip +exhaust = ~270. No idea how they plan to do it. I imagine that is very aggressive tuning, and the normal street programs will be more around 250 or so.

 

Ok, I just bought a B6 and now I am wondering if I should have bought something else...why all the dislike for the B6's????? Oh well, at least I am not driving a honda anymore!