For my fellow 2.8 owners, Why we should never mod for speed...
ORIGINAL: AteUrV8
Oy... dont get me depressed... but honestly I just sat down and looked at the whole situation one day and realized if i want that type of power than nitrous would be a way cheaper way to go, and plus when i had a good amount of money saved up to put towards the supercharger, I was in best buy one day and my emotions got the best of me and I decided to get the $2000 eclipse avn5500 navi/dvd/cd/mp3 along with $1000 of dynamat so my car didnt rattle anymore, lol. So ever since than I never had the motivation to save up another $3000... right now I got about $2k to play with but still,its not anywhere near $5000. My goal of a S/C audi just began to get smaller and smaller with passing time.
ORIGINAL: onepoint8tee
I was talking to ateurv8, but thats cools-haha
ORIGINAL: UpstateNYA4
You never know, maybe at some point it'll happen, but I have to think smart about it, since I have a mortgage and two kids. I may get a wild hair at some point and just go for it, but it'll have to be some sort of a deal, like the one recently on eBay or something, not retail - it's just too much money to legitimately put into the car right now. We'll see though...
You never know, maybe at some point it'll happen, but I have to think smart about it, since I have a mortgage and two kids. I may get a wild hair at some point and just go for it, but it'll have to be some sort of a deal, like the one recently on eBay or something, not retail - it's just too much money to legitimately put into the car right now. We'll see though...
and i agree, the cost vs gains so far has me driving pretty much stock with a few added luxuries any little thing i try doing to her she gets all fussy, one time wouldnt go into reverse the day i used just reg gas and not the super (odd?)
then again i am envious of these modded out 400+ hp rs4 conversions, also envious of the guys salary to afford that type of project
ORIGINAL: AteUrV8
STOCK 30V 2.8L- 190HP 208TRQ
GIAC 30V CHIP - 200HP 218TQ - $300
SHORT RAM INTAKE W/ K&N - 203HP 220TQ - $100 after shipping and k&n replacement of ebay filter
UNORTHODOX UNDERDRIVE PULLEY - 207HP 224TQ - $180 shipped + install ($80)
CUSTOM 2.5" CAT BACK EXHAUST W/ MAGNAFLOW - 211HP 229TQ - $300
CUSTOM FABRICATED HEADERS - 217HP 232TQ- $650
TOTAL GAINS = +27HP +24TQ = $1530
STOCK 30V 2.8L- 190HP 208TRQ
GIAC 30V CHIP - 200HP 218TQ - $300
SHORT RAM INTAKE W/ K&N - 203HP 220TQ - $100 after shipping and k&n replacement of ebay filter
UNORTHODOX UNDERDRIVE PULLEY - 207HP 224TQ - $180 shipped + install ($80)
CUSTOM 2.5" CAT BACK EXHAUST W/ MAGNAFLOW - 211HP 229TQ - $300
CUSTOM FABRICATED HEADERS - 217HP 232TQ- $650
TOTAL GAINS = +27HP +24TQ = $1530
it just doesn't work like that.. especially on a N/A car.. why can't people understand this? and you forgot the cost of labor for pulling the engine in order to put on new headers. and new headers(supersprint) are the only way you'll be able to take advantage of an exhaust on a 2.8
and for all your other banter, it can simply be sumed up with one definition - To each his own.. me personally, ilike a mix of the show and go. others might like one or the other. that's why it's they're car.. my buddy could car less about what his prefacelift 2.8 looks like but it'll have over 500Awhp soon. you can't say that that isn't kick ***
The other funny thing is that you said what they would be equal to in a 1/4 mile time. I get mad when people use a 1/4 mile time as the standard to judge performance. Sure, it would work on a Mustang orCamaro (or anything made for dragging), but remember that Audi isn't exactly about going fast in a straight line. Quattro is for turns, not speed off the line.
Take a Porsche 944 vs. a Corvette of the same era - the Corvette is obviously faster off the line and in a drag, but the 944 outhandles the Corvette in the hands of an experienced driver. Does that mean that the 944 is a lesser car just because it isn't as fast in a 1/4 mile? They are both great cars, but are built for different things.
There are plenty of ways to make a 2.8 fast, but just like every other n/a car, its a slow and expensive process. Why not look into cams? Individual throttle bodies? Its all really about what you are willing to custom fab for the car.
Take a Porsche 944 vs. a Corvette of the same era - the Corvette is obviously faster off the line and in a drag, but the 944 outhandles the Corvette in the hands of an experienced driver. Does that mean that the 944 is a lesser car just because it isn't as fast in a 1/4 mile? They are both great cars, but are built for different things.
There are plenty of ways to make a 2.8 fast, but just like every other n/a car, its a slow and expensive process. Why not look into cams? Individual throttle bodies? Its all really about what you are willing to custom fab for the car.
if you were going to install cams im sure you would have everything on the list already done... nobody just jumps right into putting a set of cams on a car....
and i never said there any less of a car, just not worth it to mod for speed, there made to mod for suspension and visual pleasure.
Its incredibly hard to get 50hp out of an na motor without doing internal work or forced induction..
and i never said there any less of a car, just not worth it to mod for speed, there made to mod for suspension and visual pleasure.
Its incredibly hard to get 50hp out of an na motor without doing internal work or forced induction..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



