Audi A6 The mid-sized Audi A6 model offers more room to the driver and passengers over the A4 line.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.2 Vs 2.7t Maintenance Difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-26-2010, 02:24 AM
gkb's Avatar
gkb
gkb is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 83
Default 4.2 Vs 2.7t Maintenance Difference

Hi all, finally made up my mind not going with the 2.7t anymore just can't be bothered with the maintenance/problems (yes we all love Audi and no i'm not lazy, so let's just be honest and admit the 2.7t was a bad build reliability wise)

looking for a 2004 A6 4.2 Mods will be: PES Chip, Full Exhaust, and if I ever get smoked to bad then go get a PES 4.2 kit.


Just wondering if anyone can give me some insight on the 4.2
things like, what mileage to change timing belt, water pump, any similar problems like the 2.7t? basically what to look out for and what to expect! mileage will be under 50k if I cannot locate one then no more than 70k.
 
  #2  
Old 04-26-2010, 01:38 PM
jhuffman's Avatar
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 772
Default

The 2.7t imho was not a bad build. The stock block and heads will last over 300,000 miles if maintained. The turbos were a fluke, I'll say that, but other than that, the 2.7 is a good engine as far as twin turbo setups go. the 4.2 is also a good choice though, its just a matter of whether you like boost or big engines.
 
  #3  
Old 04-26-2010, 04:00 PM
gkb's Avatar
gkb
gkb is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by jhuffman
The 2.7t imho was not a bad build. The stock block and heads will last over 300,000 miles if maintained. The turbos were a fluke, I'll say that, but other than that, the 2.7 is a good engine as far as twin turbo setups go. the 4.2 is also a good choice though, its just a matter of whether you like boost or big engines.

agreed. but you can make about 420hp with a PES stage 1+ kit, and full exhaust. just a fraction of the comparison to the options you can do with the 2.7t but 420hp is plenty.

so what would you say about 4.2 reliability? are there basic maintenance headaches like, C.V joints, tie rods, gaskets, oil leaks, hoses, early 60k full timing belt change, (in the tips and suggestions for 2.7t owner)
are these problems just with the 2.7t, or just the whole C5 build?
 
  #4  
Old 04-27-2010, 08:29 AM
steckrca's Avatar
1st Gear
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 16
Default

I just posted this problem with my CV shafts. https://www.audiforums.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=149667 I haven't had any other problems with the car that would be solely due to its drivetrain. My AC compressor locked up at about 90K, control arms started to make noise at around 100K, and replaced the shocks while doing the control arms. Again, nothing specifically related to the 4.2. It's a strong motor, and (knock on wood) I haven't had any major problems yet.
 
  #5  
Old 04-27-2010, 06:18 PM
ppgoal's Avatar
3rd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Holland MI
Posts: 2,723
Default

Nothing wrong with the 2.7T engine. And anything that spins over 20,000 rpm will eventually wear out. Knock on wood, just under 170k miles on mine and only failures were alternator, clutch, and headlight washers. Still original battery, suspension, and shocks. Chipped since 75k, but I don't beat the $hit out of it and do all maintenance.
 
  #6  
Old 04-27-2010, 06:49 PM
gkb's Avatar
gkb
gkb is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 83
Default

Thanks for the tips guys, picking up next week so any more advice or experiences is well appreciated. Might just get a C6 though (def more reliable).

Thats the only thing I hate about reviews though you guys are making me just want to go pick up the C5, 04 4.2 or 04 s-line 2.7t because you haven't had much problems (knock on wood) BUT.................then theres another group saying no way! lol
 
  #7  
Old 04-28-2010, 10:07 AM
jhuffman's Avatar
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 772
Default

I swear that if you go through these forums every thread where someone asks about the 2.7 we all say the most negative things. I don't think anyone has ever actually thought it would be a good car after they posted. Every car needs maintenance, the audi just needs alittle extra TLC but it totally delivers in driving satisfaction.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dktenor
Audi A5
24
04-13-2017 06:57 AM
04A64.2
S Car Model Line
4
01-23-2013 03:04 PM
chassis_na6c
Audi A4
4
10-31-2007 02:58 PM
Little
Audi A3
17
07-08-2007 03:18 AM



Quick Reply: 4.2 Vs 2.7t Maintenance Difference



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.