B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

2.8 30v Twin Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #71  
deephouse's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 83
From: San Diego / San Francisco
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

Have you tried 034 Motorsports?
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #72  
ItsThat2.0T's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 195
From:
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

all this tech talk is makin my eyes hurt. I'm cravin a vid...
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #73  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

should we dumb it down a bit? His turbos are bigger than stock turbos on a s4 and he needs something to control the engine [8D]
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #74  
ItsThat2.0T's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 195
From:
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

ORIGINAL: cincyTT

should we dumb it down a bit? His turbos are bigger than stock turbos on a s4 and he needs something to control the engine [8D]
good to see you have a sense of humor sometimes [8D]

I take offense to the request of dumbing it down btw!
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #75  
cincyTT's Avatar
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

Come on.... it was funny

You just need some visual gradification huh?
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #76  
ItsThat2.0T's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 195
From:
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

clearly.
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #77  
jonus079's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 403
From:
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

i see alot of benifits with turbo charging over supercharging. mainly that 2 gt28r would support around 600hp (of course a stock 2.8 wont hold up to that). it also helps that it would be intercooled. i was looking at pictures of the g2 supercharger and there is no intercooler between the engine and supercharger which is kinda scary. i can understand why they didnt include one however because it would have to be a liquid cooled plate type intercooler which would greatly increase the cost of the kit.

the main benifit of supercharging is that its simple.
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #78  
MrFlippant's Avatar
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,115
From: Des Moines
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

I think if you made a kit like that, and you had several different kit options like UpstateNYA4 has said, you should also include the option for upgraded internals and compression-dropping gaskets and such, for those who want ludicrous power. I agree that the kit would be absolutely pointless if it didn't include (or have available) matching engine management.

Also, what about us 12vers? Would it really be impossible to come up with something similar for the 12v 2.8?
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #79  
AudiCross's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
From:
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

haha i think that + 12v would = b00m
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #80  
chaos92287's Avatar
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,355
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: 2.8 30v Twin Turbo

ORIGINAL: MrFlippant

I think if you made a kit like that, and you had several different kit options like UpstateNYA4 has said, you should also include the option for upgraded internals and compression-dropping gaskets and such, for those who want ludicrous power. I agree that the kit would be absolutely pointless if it didn't include (or have available) matching engine management.

Also, what about us 12vers? Would it really be impossible to come up with something similar for the 12v 2.8?
Hitachi ECU ftl! unless you went standalone, it wouldn't happen. and if your gona dump that much money into a 12v i would have to question your intelligence
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.