B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

smallest rim size i can run on a b5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #21  
redline380's Avatar
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default

I should mention the size of the wheel doesn't matter much its the size of the tire. For instance my 15's run 195/65 tires, my 17's run 225/45 tires. Not much difference in rolling diameter. I will admit the smaller wheels give a better ride because of the extra sidewall on the tires. But the ride height is essentially the same.
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #22  
meloman's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 630
From: Upstate, NY
Default

Originally Posted by meh.
I'm not sure if you're referring to me, but I was calm all along.

I made a joke about deleting the rear brakes (originally from AZ) and OP got mad.

I never called OP names or anything.

I just sat back and enjoyed his anger.
No no no, I was cometely agreeing with you meh.

The op is just always trying to pick fights in threads for no reason.
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 10:54 AM
  #23  
meloman's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 630
From: Upstate, NY
Default

Also for what it's worth, lowering springs would essentially make the car "quicker" with a stiffened up suspension you won't have as much body movement or "dump" in the rear when you launch and lower will have better aerodynamics than a stock height car, just food for thought.
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 12:42 PM
  #24  
kriptonik's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,291
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

^ what he said. If you wanna do launches and be quick as heck, lower the car.

And LOL @ meh.
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 01:48 PM
  #25  
meh.'s Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 150
From: Northern California
Default

I'm the victim here.
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #26  
kriptonik's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,291
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

It's not that bad. He just blocked you.
 
Old Dec 24, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #27  
Subarashī Kao's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 262
Default

well hello to all i just did the swap and so far i love it me and my friend weight the 15" and the 16" tire and rim with its correct tire pressure and we got a total of a clean 7lb difference between 15" and 16" i saved 28lb total took my baby out raced a 350Z from a dig he beat me by close to a car rematch soon since i had stock cat stock dp so lets see how that goes. over all saving the weight where it counts really helps no doubt.
 
Old Dec 24, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #28  
jonbonesjones's Avatar
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,380
Default

You know you can save just as much by runnong a bigger, lighter wheel. Lets see pics with the 15s
 
Old Dec 24, 2012 | 02:27 PM
  #29  
chocalotstarfish's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,289
From: USA
Default

So a car with twice the hp and same weight but it was close?
 
Old Dec 24, 2012 | 03:44 PM
  #30  
livinglegend2100's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 247
From: Elk River, MN
Default

just some more food for thought here, but having the lightest wheel/tire combo possible isnt exactly ideal. Since you are using your weight savings as a performance bias, I would look into how inertia effects a cars performance. reducing your rolling resistance is nice, but you can go too light and it will actually hinder your performance. expecially with big fat 15" tires. theres a reason you dont see people on the track with small wheels and giant side walls.

again. just my .02. throw some pictures up of the car with the new wheels
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM.