B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Superchargers for 2.8's

Old Dec 20, 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #11  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

I think it's going to be easier to do a DIY turbocharger installation than a DIY supercharger installation. Less custom fabrication to do. You won't gain as much in the low-end as a SC but you'll have less parasitic loss. Superchargers actually eat up quite a lot of your power to actually spin themselves.
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:11 AM
  #12  
pbbg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 142
Default

Lets see your explanations on the cost difference.
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:21 AM
  #13  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by pbbg
Lets see your explanations on the cost difference.
Not gonna give you one. Do it yourself if you want it.
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #14  
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,150
From: Jersey Shore
Default

Turbo would cost way more and take a lot of fabbing lol
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:48 AM
  #15  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

realistically, how big of a turbo would you even be able to run on the 2.8? I think I read someplace that neither of the PES superchargers push more than like 8 or 10 psi (depending on the tune) because the 2.8 can't handle much more than that
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #16  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by FasterA4ThanUrs
Turbo would cost way more and take a lot of fabbing lol
Uhh, no it wouldn't. You don't even need a turbo-specific manifold unless you're looking for absolute maximum performance. You can mount it a bit further back easily. It'll have a bit more lag, but it'll be way cheaper and easier than a supercharger. You'd probably want a GT30 or so. It wouldn't be IDEAL but it would still be a good improvement.

Or you could go for twins like maybe GT22s but we're not looking for expensive, so...
 

Last edited by dragonrage; Dec 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
pbbg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 142
Default

I would think the turbo build would cost more to.
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #18  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by pbbg
I would think the turbo build would cost more to.
Which is why almost nobody does a custom supercharger setup, right? Oh wait...
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
pbbg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by CCA4
realistically, how big of a turbo would you even be able to run on the 2.8? I think I read someplace that neither of the PES superchargers push more than like 8 or 10 psi (depending on the tune) because the 2.8 can't handle much more than that
Why couldn't the 2.8 handle any more boost than 8-10psi? I would think with the larger displacement it could.
 
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #20  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by pbbg
Why couldn't the 2.8 handle any more boost than 8-10psi? I would think with the larger displacement it could.
Depends on how strong the internals/seals are and what the compression is, etc.. I don't know, but if they didn't make the engine with boost in mind then it might not take a lot without rebuilding it in a boost-friendly way.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.