downshift vs braking
#1
downshift vs braking
Hi guys... I would always love to do a downshift and use engine braking to slow down the car, is it a bad practice? Reason I am worried is, I had to replace my clutch @ 82000miles. I bought the car when it was 76000miles. Frankly I not that bad a driver that I would ruin the clutch in just about 6k miles of (enthusiastic) city driving.
Please advise...
Please advise...
#3
I try as best as i could, about 70% of the times I would have smooth shifts...
4 - 3 is almost always perfect, but 3-2 gear is my problem... i don't get it right often...
However i try to do this mostly at about 3-4k rpm sometimes at 5k rpm as well...
correct me if i am doing something wrong.
4 - 3 is almost always perfect, but 3-2 gear is my problem... i don't get it right often...
However i try to do this mostly at about 3-4k rpm sometimes at 5k rpm as well...
correct me if i am doing something wrong.
Last edited by jairajvg; 09-03-2008 at 05:58 PM.
#6
Wow,
When I had my Porsche, I use to to drivers ed and performance driving events with PCA. They (instructors that race) NEVER use your drive train to slow down. No driver does that, it stresses the drive train to much. That's what your brakes are for. Sure heel/toe to keep your transmission engaged to drive through the turn, but brake from the brakes. Look it up, or ask a driver for ALMS. Or just rip up your drive train. Your choice.
When I had my Porsche, I use to to drivers ed and performance driving events with PCA. They (instructors that race) NEVER use your drive train to slow down. No driver does that, it stresses the drive train to much. That's what your brakes are for. Sure heel/toe to keep your transmission engaged to drive through the turn, but brake from the brakes. Look it up, or ask a driver for ALMS. Or just rip up your drive train. Your choice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post