RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

I'd just like to say... LOL! @ the comment about a stock350Z being able to beat a car doing 13.7 quarters. You do realise your car is a fat pig monstrosity right? You do realise it's the bastard child of Nissan, that was only born so they could test out a V6 design for a GT-R, right?

RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

^ OMG, please tell me you are REALLY not that f*cking stupid. That post was so absolutely absurd it doesn't even to deserve to be acknowledged. Go do some research dumbass, the VQ engine series goes back to when the R33 was still in production. And the HR Z's are capable of low 13's. DE Z's were still capable of mid 13's. My Z, which I don't even own anymore, was not stock. Shut the f8ck up if you don't know what the hell you're talking about n00b....

RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

Ok first thing genius, the GT-R part was a joke, don't get your panties stuck up your ass.Second, 350z's = 280hp with a weight of 1.5 tonnes. Now to me, that's a fat ass car, not too bad compared to most of the new cars. But to the '90s cars and earlier from Japan = fat pig. Now according to independant testers, it does 14.1 for a quarter and 5.1 to 100 kmph. So your saying that can beat a car that runs 12.7 or whatever it was? I think you need to stop hanging off the cars balls and accept it for what it is.

RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

I like the video of you stomping the WRX. Frankly I have to hear about the WRX and STi all day at work. Yeah they are fast, but they are butt ugly. Thats what I say. My audi couldn't beat one unless it was stock and maybe driving backwards. But it was nice to see Krisss nice (all beit, white) A4 through down and drive away from one. nice work. Most of the time i don't care which car is fast, which car does a 7 sec quarter mile on ice with slicks on. But I will say i do get tired of hearing wrx this, STi that.... personally I like my car to be quick maybe fast but I don't really get to use it much.

1. Krissstokes car is fast
2. A4 B7 are slow and heavy
3. Getting one to the point off beating full bolt ons WRX is impressive
4. you really don't have to be that great of a driver if the race is just str8.
5. I wish we decided things on races with curves, the drag stuff is soooooooo boring.

RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

who cares

RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX
 

First off, it's hard to tell when someone's being sarcastic in text. A base Z weighs 3,200lbs. Since when is that fat??? Most new cars weigh 3,300 or more. A Corvette weighs 3,200lbs. An Sti weighs 3,200lbs. An Evo weighs 3,200lbs. How is a Z a fatass and the others not??? And you're arguement about Jap car's from the 90's is absurd. RX7 aside, do you realize how much 90's imports weighed??? The Supra is 3,500~. The 300ZX is 3,400~. The R33 was a tank. So that arguement is invalid. As for the numbers, we're magazine racing now, huh??? Lol, okay. The new Z's are low-mid 13 sec cars. The older Z's are mid-high 13 sec cars. My Z was not stock either. You're just jumping to cnclusions. And the car in question was a 13.7 sec car. Which I would've torn up in my old Z. Even from a dig in just a 1/4 race. From a roll or in a highway race, it'd be a cake walk. What do you think 13.7 sec AWD 4-cyl car traps at, lol??? Because I gaurantee it's nowhere near 107mph. Trap speed is a much better indicator to which is the faster car, but then again, w/ your seemingly endless wealth of knowledge, you probably knew that already.....;)