Audi A4 The Audi A4 model offers nimble handling and performance that makes it one of the leading cars in its class. Read more about the Audi A4 in the Audi A4 review.

Bang For The Buck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #31  
wood_e's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,764
From: Ames, IA
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

stock for stock the 2.8 is faster, but for a small investment you can blow the doors off a 2.8 with the 1.8.

If you want a faster 2.8 get the 30v.

I have the 12v and everyone knocks it. I personally think the power is adequate for the car, and with a good service history they can run up 300k+ miles.

Have you considered older Audis? Like the audi 90? That has the same 2.8 as the 12v A4s. You can get those more cheaply than a B5 A4.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #32  
cameron4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
From: Calgary, AB
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

how much BHP does the 2.8 have? from the 96' to the 01' models have does it vary?
and whats a 30v? and you have a 12v? and to wood_e, im not really into the styling
of those years.. dunno. Just not into them as much.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #33  
onepoint8tee's Avatar
Site Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,664
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

If you take care of any car it SHOULD go 300k+ miles.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #34  
gnurider1080's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
From:
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

i too am looking to pick up an a4 in the near future. what i am wondering though is how user-serviceable they typically are. i am mechanically inclined and am a fast learner when it comes to doing my own work. would i be able to do most work on the car myself? i know that there are some cars out there today that just by the way they are designed it is extremely difficult to do work on them due to the car requiring rare tools and all that. thanks for the help.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #35  
Trey25's Avatar
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,794
From: Home of the Yankees
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?


ORIGINAL: wood_e

stock for stock the 2.8 is faster, but for a small investment you can blow the doors off a 2.8 with the 1.8.
Would you stop saying that lol
A chipped 1.8 is NOT gonna "blow the doors off" a 2.8. Maybe a car couple car lengths after 60mph, MAYBE. Ok yes it will skool your 12V but thats a different story lol

If your mechanically inclined then you should have no problems around an Audi, and yes you can do most of the work yourself. The 1.8 is very tuner friendly but look under the hood of a 2.8 and you'll see that space is at a premium. The special tools needed are annoying but they can be had cheaply.

12V=2 valves per cylinder, 170 hp in the 96 and 97 models...30V= 5 valves per cylinder, 193hp in the 98+ models. In conclusion 12Vs suck lol
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #36  
onepoint8tee's Avatar
Site Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,664
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

ya a chipped 1.8t may be faster than a 12v and 30v but i wouldnt say it blows the doors off of either one. Blowing the doors off would be winning by 10 car lengths or more in a race.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #37  
Jeff's Avatar
Zombie Defense Force
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,782
From: Dallas
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

ORIGINAL: onepoint8tee

ya a chipped 1.8t may be faster than a 12v and 30v but i wouldnt say it blows the doors off of either one. Blowing the doors off would be winning by 10 car lengths or more in a race.
ummm t3t4 1.8t
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 11:04 PM
  #38  
wood_e's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,764
From: Ames, IA
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

lol i love this thread.

Ok, ok, a chipped 1.8t will beat a 30v but not by much and the 12v by a bit more.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #39  
Trey25's Avatar
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,794
From: Home of the Yankees
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

Just curious, whats the whp on a t3t4 setup? I'm guessing thats a BT which requires alot of spool. Which would be great on a drag strip but wouldn't a SC 2.8 be quicker around a tight track like say a street circuit. Sorry about the thread jacking.
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #40  
cameron4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
From: Calgary, AB
Default RE: Bang For The Buck?

Ahaha, its cool guys, just keep chattin its great cause i'm learning stuff as you go so
I have no problem with it. So you said the 98+ runs 193bhp, is that with the actall 98'
year? And does it have to be the quattro? So I think I got it.. the 1996 and 1997 model
of the 2.8 are 12v thus making it 170 hp.. and the 1998 year and up are running the 30v
at 193hp?? lol oh god I hope thats right. ahaha, and can you chip the 2.8L models? how
much extra power would that add? 20hp? 40hp?
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.