supercharger vs. turbo

Subscribe
Jan 15, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #1  
Which would be better to put on an 1999 2,8 quattro? Any types your would recomend that u know are realiable?
Reply
Jan 15, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #2  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
You have to put a supercharger, the pes kit is very reliable. Thats what id go with, heres a link www.pes-tuning.com
Reply
Jan 15, 2005 | 12:54 AM
  #3  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
supercharger all the way
Reply
Jan 15, 2005 | 02:13 AM
  #4  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
BOOST IS AWESOME! Supercharge eaton rules the kingdom of boost.........i meana second to turbos
Reply
Jan 15, 2005 | 02:16 AM
  #5  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
Yeah there really isn't much of an option, unless you want to spend a ton of money for some custom turbo work. Obviously you havn't done any research.
Reply
Jan 15, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #6  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
supercharger is the only way to really go wit the 2.8s
Reply
Jan 16, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #7  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
do a tri-turbo conversion. talk about some power.

heres a tri-rotor tri-turbo rx7

Reply
Jan 16, 2005 | 02:03 AM
  #8  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
that is a sick motor i just wish those rotary were relible i know 3 buddys that have them and they have had to get there motors rebuit once each already if they were relible i would definetly have one love those FD's
Reply
Jan 16, 2005 | 02:08 AM
  #9  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo
that's sic
Reply
Jan 16, 2005 | 02:36 AM
  #10  
RE: supercharger vs. turbo

Quote:
ORIGINAL: clconversion

that is a sick motor i just wish those rotary were relible i know 3 buddys that have them and they have had to get there motors rebuit once each already if they were relible i would definetly have one love those FD's

how many miles did they have on the engines?
Reply
Subscribe