umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
Thread Starter
|
Administrator
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,981
From: Seattle, WA
RE: umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
ORIGINAL: cincyTT
The first chart has the timing bouncing everywhere. Also in the last two its way to low in the 5.5+rpm range. your at 5-8* advanced where most are 15-24* advanced to redline.
As for boost, you are pretty far below requested till almost 4k and then you are spot on for about as long as your power is strong on the dynos and then you are a good amount above it from about 5300rpm's on
That first chart is pretty bad altogether where the next to are so so. Have you tried the MAF yet? Sorry Sean, just asking.
The first chart has the timing bouncing everywhere. Also in the last two its way to low in the 5.5+rpm range. your at 5-8* advanced where most are 15-24* advanced to redline.
As for boost, you are pretty far below requested till almost 4k and then you are spot on for about as long as your power is strong on the dynos and then you are a good amount above it from about 5300rpm's on
That first chart is pretty bad altogether where the next to are so so. Have you tried the MAF yet? Sorry Sean, just asking.
Thread Starter
|
Administrator
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,981
From: Seattle, WA
RE: umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
These logs look any better??
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...JIxTDuzHPwqRTQ
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...JIztKn8EkdSaRA
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...JIxTDuzHPwqRTQ
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...JIztKn8EkdSaRA
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,005
From: British Columbia
RE: umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
I'm pretty new to the logs thing, but it looks to me like your timing is still not being advanced anywhere near as much as it should be between about 3.5K and redline. bad knock sensor maybe?
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
RE: umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
Your timing looks ok until about 4500rpms and then it never comes back up. Here is a log it should look more like, its a uni 630 file with a 30r @ 19psi.
So did it feel any better with the maf, it looked a little smoother but still with a timing issue?
So did it feel any better with the maf, it looked a little smoother but still with a timing issue?
Thread Starter
|
Administrator
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,981
From: Seattle, WA
RE: umm this doesnt look good (dyno results)
It felt better without the MAF, but the numbers show that its running better with the MAF.. The timing issue might be the timing map that im running