Boost controller, intercooler, etc.
hpbc ftw!
When it comes to intercoolers, you get what you pay for. The higher the cost is mainly based on whats inside (more fins/inch) which lowers the temps far better. Just remember that all these cores are aluminum which isnt the best conductor so the more fins to pull the heat away the better
When it comes to intercoolers, you get what you pay for. The higher the cost is mainly based on whats inside (more fins/inch) which lowers the temps far better. Just remember that all these cores are aluminum which isnt the best conductor so the more fins to pull the heat away the better
Last edited by myslow1; Jan 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM.
myslow1, fins ARE surface area, the more fins there are, the more surface area there is; also, tube-and-fin FMICs (aka cheap ones) are not as efficent as bar-and-plate. Some are "good for the money," but ultimately a b-a-p will perform better
he made a total of 5 pulls on the dyno. The last 3 were pretty much back to back and he made the most power on his 4th pull. When all was said an done on his last pull the charge pipe going into the throttle body (cold side) was still cold.
l88 im talking about bar and plate ics they have them on ebay.
Im just saying why would i spend an extra 150-300 when i dont need to. Thats stupidity.
l88 im talking about bar and plate ics they have them on ebay.
Im just saying why would i spend an extra 150-300 when i dont need to. Thats stupidity.
it will hold up
and its not really a matter of perform/don't perform aka 'hold up'. Its more perform, or perform well. A cheap core will cool, a good core will cool better. It IS 'get what you pay for' when cooler air means more Hp. End tank design makes a difference even.
But here's teh tricky part. More surface area inside the core isn't always a good thing. The more surface area, the more restriction, the greater the differential pressure between end tanks, so a smaller turbo setup would suffer since its already pushing hard to create the flow you need. You need to find the balance point between how much cooling you want and how much restriction you're willing to deal with.
But here's teh tricky part. More surface area inside the core isn't always a good thing. The more surface area, the more restriction, the greater the differential pressure between end tanks, so a smaller turbo setup would suffer since its already pushing hard to create the flow you need. You need to find the balance point between how much cooling you want and how much restriction you're willing to deal with.
As for get what you pay for, compare an expensive core (garrett, precision, greddy, etc) vs a ebay core. The more expensive core will be very high fin/inch count vs a ebay core which is far from dense (you can see right through it with ease. The makes the cores smaller and have a higher efficiency rate. With an ebay core, you need a much larger core to get close. The best balance between high cost and ebay i have found is treadstone. Its not as high dense as a garrett, but no where near the as low dense as ebay. The also have the fins offset so you cool much better.
Going back to the aluminum thing, like i have said, it is a very poor conductor of heat. You need more fins to cool and the more aluminum used means more money. A precision 350hp core ($250) will cool better than a ebay core that is as taller and wider as it.
dont get me wrong, an ebay will work, but just at a lower heat transer efficiecy and will cause you to lose power over all and possibly more so after each pull
i can afford it im just not going to spend it. I think an ebay core will be fine for my car with the mods i want. Im not going bt therefore 100 > 250+


