You have missed the point. My preference is not due to bling factor. EBC can compensate for changes in temperature, barometric pressure, and engine load. Much more of an exact science. MBC cannot and worse bypasses your ecu which can. Not that you can't set an MBC to run good but when conditions change you have to re-set it to run your desired boost. Achip and n75(race or not) is much more precise than a MBC.

 

I'm too lazy to fully argue this point...

I thought you were "too high class" for an mbc.

So: I agree partially. There are features that sound nice.
But I'd rather fill my gas tank and buy a mountain dew 4x than have them.

 

Nothing to do with " Class ". Everything to due with precision and consistency.

 

not to be mean, but you are a tard if you choose a n75 over a ebc. Spending $75 on a stupid n75 valve when you have a much better performing controller already. So i stand by my statement that you dont have a ebc, or your a tard.

 

The n75 was to change the boost curve. I am very happy with the results. The ecu/n75 combination does as well as the ebc. If it did not I would install it. I have been building/tuning 4 cylinder turbo engines since 1992. I think you were still falling off your bicycle in 1992. My last 4 cylinder made over 450whp. Not bad for a "tard".

 

[sm=icon_blah.gif]< thats about all i heard

If you knew better, the ebc would hold boost FAR longer than the n75 ever could and would make a FAR better boost curve. So stop talking about what you "did" and start learning about what your doing!

 

Sorry man that came out a little more abrasive than it was intended.

 

1992?

Shelby dodges?

 

Coming from the DSM community the level of mis-understanding in the Audi community is astounding.

 

so you want praise for building a 450whp 4g63? wow, thats hard [sm=sigh.gif]