B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

2.8 rebuild advice ???power????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,150
From: Jersey Shore
Default

Originally Posted by UpstateNYA4
For this exact reason, your car is screaming for a VR6T swap. I'm not talking about a fully built, internallly-modded GT3076 car that will set you back $12-15k, but a strong 24v VR6 with a stage 1 or 2 turbo setup on stock internals. You'd have a 325-375hp boosted six-cylinder A4 for a little more than what most of us paid for our stock 2.8L cars. That my friend, is what you should be thinking about. No crazy 30psi engine build, but a solid, fast, S4-beating 2.8L.
IMO, once I spent the cash to effectively swap the VR6 in, some internals and a bigger snail would almost be mandatory. You would just end up doing it later and wasting money changing components to run the new setup. And it would be more than 12-15k for a proper setup...
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #32  
ImTheDevil's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,670
From: Binghamton, NY
Default

For some, that may be feasible, but it's not required for the swap. Sounds as if he'd rather get the car on the road with some basic upgrading, without an all-out power build. Get a bolt-on low-stage turbo system and opening the block isn't necessary, thus saving lots of effort, money, and time (on top of the considerable effort, money, and time already required just to do the swap).

I agree, better to do it big and get the most out of it, but that's not everyone and not necessary in order to have a VR6T in the car. And a 325-375hp A4 would be a formidable road car in its own right, able to take down quite a few machines that would otherwise gut it and leave it for dead. It doesn't HAVE to have 500-600hp, although I agree with you that it'd be best that way. Nothing says he would do that later on either - many of us would, but not all of us.
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #33  
ghost6303's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default

i think most people's reasoning is this- if your going to spend 85% of the money to just do the basic swap and get it all running, you may as well spend the extra 15% and drasticly up the horsepower output, not have to retune and upgrade and re-buy parts in the future if you decide to do this later.

this is a big delema for many people.
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #34  
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,150
From: Jersey Shore
Default

Originally Posted by ghost6303
i think most people's reasoning is this- if your going to spend 85% of the money to just do the basic swap and get it all running, you may as well spend the extra 15% and drasticly up the horsepower output, not have to retune and upgrade and re-buy parts in the future if you decide to do this later.

this is a big delema for many people.
pretty much what i was getting at...
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:34 PM
  #35  
ghost6303's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,158
From: CT
Default

just restating it for the lazys who dont like to read more then 2 sentences
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doityourselfer
B5 Models
2
Nov 12, 2014 02:01 PM
AudiTurbo
B5 Models
18
Jan 7, 2014 08:03 AM
ponyboy02
B6 Models
0
Sep 24, 2011 12:19 AM
kril29
Audi A4
14
May 17, 2006 03:40 PM
ScorpionRS
Audi A4
2
Oct 19, 2004 04:04 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.