B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Poke?

Old Dec 30, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #11  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

"poke" is when your wheels/tires poke out past the fenders, like this guy's:


He's also rocking some pretty serious stretch, which is putting narrow tires on wide wheels. This prevents them from rubbing on the fenders so you can get more poke and be lower
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #12  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

LOL beat me to it! plus we used the same car. I fail!
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #13  
aledelic42's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,058
From: Bethlehem, PA
Default

lol, moar poke..









Name:  dbadgedtires__2-1.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  34.9 KB

Name:  downsized_1002091743.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  29.3 KB

Name:  downsized_1002091812.jpg
Views: 121
Size:  33.7 KB
this silver avant has 8.5" et21 with 12mm spacer in the back, for reference. he's pretty flush in the front and poking a bit in the back

10-15mm spacing won't be flush on stock 7" wheels
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #14  
codymack43's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 333
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Default

that looks like a good way to get BAD curb rash if you have the rim past the tire like that.... i dont like the look of it tho.
My back tires stick out past the fender but the tires cover the full rim.
IMG_0156.jpg?t=1262203565
Kinda hard to see.. but is this what you mean? or does the tire have to be too small to "poke"
 

Last edited by codymack43; Dec 30, 2009 at 03:19 PM.
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
codymack43's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 333
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Default

^^ lol guy with the org / black rims was in eurotuner ... but im sure you all knew that lol
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #16  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

nah you've got it. the point of the small tires is so you can have as much poke as you, but still lower your car. say, for example, you wanted to put your car on coilovers. you wouldn't be able to lower it as much because the tires would grind on your fenders. make sense? so by adding "stretch" to the "poke" you get moar low.
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #17  
kriptonik's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,291
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by hiwords
nick: if you want the achieve flush, i'd say 10-15mm is a good guess. like others say though, your wheel bearings will absolutely hate you. as for poking, i wouldn't go that route unless you're going to run stretch. also your rear fenders would need to be rolled as the front are rolled front factory.
Don't you mean the rears are factory rolled instead of the fronts?

BTW - you can see my signature for "poke". Although I'm not as drastic when it comes to the poke (as others), you can see the wheel and tire are on the outer side of the fender instead of being flushed or within the fender.
 

Last edited by kriptonik; Dec 30, 2009 at 04:32 PM.
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #18  
NickBroderick's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,617
From: Mansfield, MA
Default

Alright let me update this to be clear. Come spring time I want to bag my car. I want to put 17" wheels (I think.) on my car with maybe an 8" width. I'd rather my wheels be flush than poking, I was just curious. So play around with those dimensions I gave you aha.
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #19  
aledelic42's Avatar
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,058
From: Bethlehem, PA
Default

8" wide would be flush around et15-17 I think
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #20  
kriptonik's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,291
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

15-17 would be poking a little. You should be okay with 25-30 offset with 8 inches wide wheels.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 PM.