trans am vs audi tt
If that TT doesn't have a Howitzer to launch it from the line, this race is over before it starts. He can race from a roll, from a dead stop, from a highway roll, in reverse, down a hill, up a hill, whereever (well, maybe not around a nice set of turns) and the result will be the same every time.
that tt would only need a basic turbo upgrade to beat an ls1. I can take an ls-1 camaro ss or a ws-6(have raced both) fairly easily, and I have all wheel drive! And if the tt is quattro, then how is the camaro going to kill it off of the line?
that tt would only need a basic turbo upgrade to beat an ls1. I can take an ls-1 camaro ss or a ws-6(have raced both) fairly easily, and I have all wheel drive! And if the tt is quattro, then how is the camaro going to kill it off of the line?
lol this thread cracks me up. tho i do gota agree wit badluck about mustangs being better
i had 2 foxbodies, one with a 5.0 and the other with a supercharged 347 (didn't have it long cause gas was 3.25 at the time) and i can officially say i spanked any TA that i came across
i had 2 foxbodies, one with a 5.0 and the other with a supercharged 347 (didn't have it long cause gas was 3.25 at the time) and i can officially say i spanked any TA that i came across
you all know what IROC stands for right "Italian retard on crack" the Trans am is Pontiac's IROC, those cars suck off the line, I had one I know, with my 4 speed i would burn through all 4 gears, my boy had a camaro with a super charger on it, that thing was stupid, he never got any traction, any time i ever raced my camaro (which was often) unless it was some rice i would almost always get beat off the line becasue i would just burn out..
nice to see some of my audi buddys get my back
nice to see some of my audi buddys get my back





