B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Let me just put this here...

Old Aug 16, 2012 | 10:51 PM
  #1  
redline380's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default Let me just put this here...

Figured the audiforums community might be interested. im not happy with the curve, as you can see its a bit late. but i already got used to it. already got plans for bigger and better.
Name:  Stellar.jpg
Views: 76
Size:  117.0 KB
info on the setup
gt2871r turbo
aeb head
81.25mm mahle powerpak pistons
maestro 630cc
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 08:42 AM
  #2  
CCA4's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,588
From: NW PA
Default

That does seem a tad late for that turbo. Awesome numbers though man. Looks like you fixed that AFR problem too. Still planning on going E85 or what's next?
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #3  
ImTheDevil's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,670
From: Binghamton, NY
Default

Nice numbers but you're right, it definitely seems leggy. What trim is the turbo?
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
redline380's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default

Originally Posted by CCA4
That does seem a tad late for that turbo. Awesome numbers though man. Looks like you fixed that AFR problem too. Still planning on going E85 or what's next?
I really wanted to go e85 this time around, but having no job means no money for expensive ev14 injectors. soon though....

Originally Posted by ImTheDevil
Nice numbers but you're right, it definitely seems leggy. What trim is the turbo?
turbo is 56 trim, .86 a/r turbine side, so it it might be a bit laggy compared to the lesser 2871r's, but it still too late. ill have to check the wastegate i suppose
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 10:53 AM
  #5  
ImTheDevil's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,670
From: Binghamton, NY
Default

.86 trim explains the lag but yeah it does seem 3-400RPM late.
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
redline380's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default

forgot to mention im at 8.5 compression. think that would affect my spool that much?
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #7  
ImTheDevil's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,670
From: Binghamton, NY
Default

Definitely. Off-boost volumetric efficiency will increase with higher compression (provided tuning is correct), and that will help you spool. I bet you'd cut lag quite a bit even at 9.0. It might cut down on the absolute amount of boost you could run, but with a higher CR you could make the same power at lower pressure. Essentially you'd make as much power, sooner, at lower boost, but with the tradeoff that your tuning would need to be precise, as a higher CR leaves less wiggle room for approximations in fueling or timing retard under boost.
 
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #8  
redline380's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Legal Moderator
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: st cloud, mn. you too? hit me up...
Default

Well of course I know lower compression will equal lower spool. I was just wondering if my compression ratio is low enough to affect spool that much or if I should bird-dog another issue. Anyone know of someone running 8.5 compression on a 2871r so I have a spool comparison?
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.