B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Turbo 2.8L 30V?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #21  
codymack43's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 333
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Default

Oh wow. Yeah thats why i decided to get a 1.8 over a 2.8. I had a few 2.8's that i was looking at but then i read the newbie thread and it set me on the 1.8t because i wanted to do some work to it. But i think the 2.8s make great show cars.
 
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #22  
airguard350's Avatar
Tech Guru
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,540
From: Lunatic Fringe
Default

Originally Posted by dragonrage
The S4 is indeed worse in that area. The S4 shows that adding that bit of weight doesn't automatically make the car suck, but that doesn't mean adding the weight is a good thing. That's why the B8 is so much better.

Will adding FI to the 2.8 add that much weight? Probably not. But every little bit hurts. I'd run stiffer suspension, maybe S4 parts. Preferrably aftermarket though.

All that said, I'd rather have a correctly tuned 2.8T over a 2.8.
No offense but I had to actually process what you said. It makes very little sense. All this guy would be doing is essentially making an S4. With the B5 S4 you can make enough power to make weight not really a factor. Look it up on youtube. There are a few 800 hp B5 S4's out there that will stomp a 1.8T in handling as well. The extra 100 lbs. hardly matters anymore.
 
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #23  
airguard350's Avatar
Tech Guru
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,540
From: Lunatic Fringe
Default

Originally Posted by AutoUnionFan
thats an awfully big project to undertake just for the fact that you found a couple k03s lying around

the suprcharger kit would be much easier and more reliable
Actually brother, if done right the turbo's would be more reliable over the long run and since you have a small motor turbo's take less power to spin. With a torquey V8 it doesn't really matter since you already make plenty of power naturally aspirated. If you want big power you have to watch what you bolt on to small engines or your gains won't be that great for what you spent on parts. To me 2-5 grand for 100 hp (PES) just doesn't sound that great. I've done the research and decided that if I go F/I I will be procharging or turbocharging.
 
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #24  
A4Cragman's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,030
From: SLC, Utah
Default

Originally Posted by airguard350
To me 2-5 grand for 100 hp (PES) just doesn't sound that great. I've done the research and decided that if I go F/I I will be procharging or turbocharging.
Same conclusion I drew. If all the bugs could be worked out and all the other necessary things that need to be done in order to run PES all for under 2 grand, it might be worth it in that case, but after you get the kit itself as well as any modifications to the exhaust and such that you have to do to see the full gain of the system, you're in it an extra grand or two, and for that, you may as well just take that 4 grand and put it towards an S4 or at least a 1.8t IMO.
 
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 10:33 PM
  #25  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Personally, if I supercharged anything, it'd have to be a twin screw setup like Kenne Bell has (not for these cars though).
 
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #26  
airguard350's Avatar
Tech Guru
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,540
From: Lunatic Fringe
Default

The closest to supercharging I would go for a 2.8 would be a procharger. Prochargers offer the best of both worlds when it comes to F/I. The reliability and efficiency of a turbo and the instant boost of a supercharger.
 
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
AutoUnionFan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,090
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Is the PES supercharger unreliable? I dont really know anything about it. I do know that a bolt on kit will be much, much easier to get going than a custum twin turbo setup that reuires custom fabrication, tuning, etc. Once you do get the turbo setup working, and IF it is done properly you will still run into problems that require specific knowledge of your system. I dont know what the stock internals of the 2.8L can handle, but that may also be a factor once you start pushing real power.

Im not saying that the supercharger is worth the money. But besides the cost, it is an easy way to upgrade power. But like I said before, I wouldnt start a twin turbo project just for the fact that there are two k03s in the shop.
 
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #28  
airguard350's Avatar
Tech Guru
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,540
From: Lunatic Fringe
Default

The stock 2.8 internals can handle around 12 psi. Too much more than that and the pistons may want to vacate the block and decide they want to take chunks of the block with them. The fact that you found 2 free k03's would make me want to start the project. Brand new, two k03's could run you about 3-4 grand. Even rebuilt ones are expensive. That takes care of about half the price of the project if you do the vast majority of the work yourself. I priced just parts and for me with the tip tranny it would run me $7-$10 grand for a twin turbo set-up.
 
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #29  
dragonrage's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,465
From: Massachusetts
Default

Personally, I don't think K03s are even worth the effort.
 
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #30  
airguard350's Avatar
Tech Guru
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,540
From: Lunatic Fringe
Default

Your mom's not worth the effort. :P
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.