Bob.. You're definitetly a retard.

Just letting you know, in a loving way.

 

that's where I went wrong......if I spent more time focusing on my shifting and less time licking my windows perhaps I could have beaten by more........lesson learned for next time.........

 

Winning by 3 car lengths is not raping someone. Winning by 6+ is raping someone. And like as been stated, if the road had been dry, you very easily could have lost. It'd at least have been very close, w/ driver being the deciding factor........

 

im still trying to figure out which cars the 1.8 and 2.7 audis can handle, and i had no idea a v6 mustang could take the a4 chipped. in my chipped 2.7T im always looking for a mustang GT, should i be looking into my wallet for more mods instead

 

I hear what you are saying, but to me it was a rape......he has more than twice the displacement that I do. I know it was wet out, but it wasn't raining out.....it was that kind of wet like 5 hours after it rains, you know how it just looks wet. I really don't think it was much if any a factor.
Anyway I'm movin on, as I'll probably never get the chance to race him again.

 

Thats why i corrected myself. The new V-6 mustand is not doin much under 7 seconds 0-60 stock,def not in the wet unless you got some super sticky tires on it. I would also like to see a time slip of a 0-60 in the 6s for your chipped 1.8t with a total of 4 people in it. 3 cars isn't exactly far if you leave in the stupid factor that stick has in terms of where and when to shift and how u do it. I'm in the NYC street racing scene,and for a special olympics race that would have been very close with 2 competent drivers.
[/quote]

again bob you can't read

and +1 amaze

here is my youtube

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_WsTXRz3VEs

 

You guys are funny.