Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #31  
SnailStyle's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

I'd just like to say... LOL! @ the comment about a stock350Z being able to beat a car doing 13.7 quarters. You do realise your car is a fat pig monstrosity right? You do realise it's the bastard child of Nissan, that was only born so they could test out a V6 design for a GT-R, right?
 
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 07:38 AM
  #32  
scg87's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 764
From:
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

^ OMG, please tell me you are REALLY not that f*cking stupid. That post was so absolutely absurd it doesn't even to deserve to be acknowledged. Go do some research dumbass, the VQ engine series goes back to when the R33 was still in production. And the HR Z's are capable of low 13's. DE Z's were still capable of mid 13's. My Z, which I don't even own anymore, was not stock. Shut the f8ck up if you don't know what the hell you're talking about n00b....
 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 03:17 AM
  #33  
SnailStyle's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

Ok first thing genius, the GT-R part was a joke, don't get your panties stuck up your ***.Second, 350z's = 280hp with a weight of 1.5 tonnes. Now to me, that's a fat *** car, not too bad compared to most of the new cars. But to the '90s cars and earlier from Japan = fat pig. Now according to independant testers, it does 14.1 for a quarter and 5.1 to 100 kmph. So your saying that can beat a car that runs 12.7 or whatever it was? I think you need to stop hanging off the cars ***** and accept it for what it is.

 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #34  
Noffy's Avatar
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 64
From:
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

I like the video of you stomping the WRX. Frankly I have to hear about the WRX and STi all day at work. Yeah they are fast, but they are butt ugly. Thats what I say. My audi couldn't beat one unless it was stock and maybe driving backwards. But it was nice to see Krisss nice (all beit, white) A4 through down and drive away from one. nice work. Most of the time i don't care which car is fast, which car does a 7 sec quarter mile on ice with slicks on. But I will say i do get tired of hearing wrx this, STi that.... personally I like my car to be quick maybe fast but I don't really get to use it much.

1. Krissstokes car is fast
2. A4 B7 are slow and heavy
3. Getting one to the point off beating full bolt ons WRX is impressive
4. you really don't have to be that great of a driver if the race is just str8.
5. I wish we decided things on races with curves, the drag stuff is soooooooo boring.
 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #35  
readimag's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 765
From: Sav, GA
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

who cares
 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #36  
scg87's Avatar
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 764
From:
Default RE: 2007 Audi A4 vs 2003 Subaru WRX

ORIGINAL: SnailStyle

Ok first thing genius, the GT-R part was a joke, don't get your panties stuck up your ***.Second, 350z's = 280hp with a weight of 1.5 tonnes. Now to me, that's a fat *** car, not too bad compared to most of the new cars. But to the '90s cars and earlier from Japan = fat pig. Now according to independant testers, it does 14.1 for a quarter and 5.1 to 100 kmph. So your saying that can beat a car that runs 12.7 or whatever it was? I think you need to stop hanging off the cars ***** and accept it for what it is.

First off, it's hard to tell when someone's being sarcastic in text. A base Z weighs 3,200lbs. Since when is that fat??? Most new cars weigh 3,300 or more. A Corvette weighs 3,200lbs. An Sti weighs 3,200lbs. An Evo weighs 3,200lbs. How is a Z a fatass and the others not??? And you're arguement about Jap car's from the 90's is absurd. RX7 aside, do you realize how much 90's imports weighed??? The Supra is 3,500~. The 300ZX is 3,400~. The R33 was a tank. So that arguement is invalid. As for the numbers, we're magazine racing now, huh??? Lol, okay. The new Z's are low-mid 13 sec cars. The older Z's are mid-high 13 sec cars. My Z was not stock either. You're just jumping to cnclusions. And the car in question was a 13.7 sec car. Which I would've torn up in my old Z. Even from a dig in just a 1/4 race. From a roll or in a highway race, it'd be a cake walk. What do you think 13.7 sec AWD 4-cyl car traps at, lol??? Because I gaurantee it's nowhere near 107mph. Trap speed is a much better indicator to which is the faster car, but then again, w/ your seemingly endless wealth of knowledge, you probably knew that already.....
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel21wolter
Archive - Vehicles for Sale
3
Jan 11, 2009 08:26 PM
bellachic
Audi A6
12
Dec 28, 2007 02:50 PM
cycl42
Audi A4
31
Jul 19, 2007 02:16 PM
JBaker
Audi A4
4
Mar 22, 2007 10:39 PM
Trey25
Sights N Sounds
3
Aug 31, 2006 02:23 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.